Attempt to allow fuzzy-match filter in json-api #71
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Notes ----- Regarding integration into fortune.js I am unsure what field of request.options may be used. As I understand it, Adapter.find leaves the possibility of extra fields on the options object unspecified. Therefore, I added the fuzzyMatch on the ptions object. Regarding validity JSON:API Filtering is relatively unspecified. As such, I assume the extra filter type is legal.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
with regard to #60, I started implementing, or rather, looking for ways to implement extensions on the current filtering possibilities.
Some notes
General
Here, I wanted fuzzy text search on a String attribute. I validated this against the fortune-postgres, which needed to be extened too.
You may find the relevant commit here: cecemel/fortune-postgres@e804615. I didn't start a PR for this one yet. I just want first to make sure we agree on interface and how the query is passed down through all layers.
So I consider this PR a base for discussion.
Regarding integration into fortune.js
I am unsure what field of
request.optionsmay be used. The fortune-postgres seemed to already use thequeryfield, of which at first sight seemed to be the wanted escape hatch, so I didn't feel like using this.So, as I understand it,
Adapter.findleaves the possibility of extra fields on the options object unspecified. Therefore, I addedfuzzyMatchon the options object.Regarding validity JSON:API
Filtering is relatively unspecified. As such, I assume the extra filter
type is legal.