fix(lint): exclude disabled ids in multi-lint passes

[0xrusowsky]

ref: #11080

[DaniPopes]

doesn't this happen because we create 2 "Imports" passes? it looks like passes with more than 1 lint will appear multiple times in the create function

[0xrusowsky]

@DaniPopes i think that the issue emerged because a pass with several lints would emit all lints, and my commit fixes it.

However, what you point out is true... i totally overlooked that when flattening the vec in the macro i'd be creating duplicated passes.

should i change the fn sigs and the macro so that they return:

pub fn create_early_lint_passes<'ast>() -> Vec<(Box<dyn EarlyLintPass<'ast>>, Vec<SolLint>)>
pub fn create_late_lint_passes<'hir>() -> Vec<(Box<dyn LateLintPass<'hir>>, Vec<SolLint>)>

alternatively, i could force each pass to be limited to one lint.

imo, despite creating an unnecessary heap allocation for each 1pass:1lint, the performance benefits of running multiple lints in one pass could still be worth it. what do u recommend doing though?

[DaniPopes]

Passes should have multiple lints, if their logic is very similar just slightly different conditions and messages then you can batch most of the work

You can return (_, &'static [SolLint]) I believe

[grandizzy]

lgtm, tests should be fixed when #11174 approved and merged