Skip to content

Conversation

@ksew1
Copy link
Member

@ksew1 ksew1 commented Oct 23, 2025

Stack:

⚠️ Part of a stack created by spr. Do not merge manually using the UI - doing so may have unexpected results.

@ksew1 ksew1 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2025 10:54
@ksew1 ksew1 requested review from ddoktorski and franciszekjob and removed request for a team October 23, 2025 10:54
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like these improvements but I wonder if some kind of builder for metadata command wouldn't be more extensible?
The current approach is purpose built for 3 different use-cases and maybe that's enough improvements, but I wonder what you think.

cc @franciszekjob @ddoktorski

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The idea behind this is to discourage the use of too many options. The issue with the previous solution was that too much freedom resulted in metadata calls that were not consistent.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, if the rest also disagrees with generalizing this, just disregard my comment.

commit-id:a2fe82e0
@ksew1 ksew1 force-pushed the spr/master/a2fe82e0 branch from 85c48ae to bddfb28 Compare October 24, 2025 11:20
@ksew1 ksew1 force-pushed the spr/master/e0444c34 branch from da6c635 to b80e7db Compare October 24, 2025 11:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants