ggml-cpu: arm64: q4_K repack gemm and gemv implementations (i8mm)

[Alcpz]

This PR improves q4_k_q8_k gemm and gemv in arm64 using i8mm and vecdot instructions.

Tested on an Apple M4 with Liquid LFM2-1.2B model:

./bin/llama-bench -p 256 -n 128 -pg 0,0 -t 8 -m models/LFM2-1.2B-Q4_K_M.gguf,models/LFM2-1.2B-Q4_K_pure.gguf

model	backend	test	t/s (master)	t/s (this PR)	speedup
lfm2 1.2B Q4_K - Medium	CPU	pp256	436.57 ± 0.40	673.30 ± 2.56	1.54
lfm2 1.2B Q4_K - Medium	CPU	tg128	217.84 ± 8.17	229.91 ± 1.22	1.06
lfm2 1.2B Q4_K - Medium (pure Q4_K)	CPU	pp256	462.25 ± 0.67	800.99 ± 3.61	1.73
lfm2 1.2B Q4_K - Medium (pure Q4_K)	CPU	tg128	241.74 ± 1.47	254.42 ± 2.42	1.05
llama 8B Q4_K - Medium	CPU	pp256	62.43 ± 1.19	99.52 ± 0.11	1.54
llama 8B Q4_K - Medium	CPU	tg128	36.70 ± 0.70	42.47 ± 0.32	1.15

Master build: 8cf6b42 (6824)
This PR: c4f1358

Perplexity remains unchanged (teste current build vs master):

Llama3.1: 7.8861 +/- 0.11849 
LFM2 1.2B: 16.9954 +/- 0.97671

As for test-backend-ops, I've checked the output of the layer tensors manually comparing REPACK vs master, since #16182 is still ongoing.

Any suggestions on how to better test the PR is welcomed.

[ggerganov]

Fix a few instances of this code style:

Suggested change

	const uint8_t *q4_base = q4_ptr[b].qs + sb * QK_K;
	const uint8_t * q4_base = q4_ptr[b].qs + sb * QK_K;

[Alcpz]

Applied clang-format. Sorry about that!