Skip to content

prefer atomic values to atomic operations #1048

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2025

Conversation

serprex
Copy link
Contributor

@serprex serprex commented Jul 4, 2025

not sure why there's no atomic.NewUint32,
so leave baseConnID alone

not sure why there's no atomic.NewUint32,
so leave baseConnID alone
@serprex serprex requested a review from lance6716 July 4, 2025 06:40
@lance6716 lance6716 merged commit bf1f86b into go-mysql-org:master Jul 4, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants