Skip to content

Conversation

@openjck
Copy link
Contributor

@openjck openjck commented Feb 9, 2016

This reverts the merge of #169, which was obsolete but accidentally left open. We should merge #172 instead.

This reverts the merge of groovecoder#169, which was obsolete but accidentally left
open. We should merge groovecoder#172 instead.
@openjck
Copy link
Contributor Author

openjck commented Mar 10, 2016

Almost forgot about this. Can we merge this? I'm not sure why tests are failing, but this is just a straight revert of earlier commits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants