-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Implement Authentication & User Management #40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Comment |
|
This repository is associated with groupthinking whose free trial has ended. Subscribe at jazzberry.ai. |
Co-authored-by: groupthinking <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: groupthinking <[email protected]>
…en generation Co-authored-by: groupthinking <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| const user = { | ||
| id: crypto.randomUUID(), | ||
| email: data.email, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Import crypto before generating user IDs
The auth service’s register handler builds a new user with crypto.randomUUID() but the module never imports crypto, and the tsconfig only includes the ES2020 lib (no DOM globals). As a result crypto is undefined at compile time and tsc will fail with “Cannot find name 'crypto'”, preventing the auth service from building or starting.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR implements comprehensive authentication and user management for the AJOB4AGENT platform, adding multi-user support through NextAuth.js for the dashboard and a standalone JWT-based auth service for APIs.
Key Changes:
- NextAuth.js integration with Google/GitHub OAuth and email/password authentication
- Standalone Express-based auth service with JWT access/refresh tokens
- Prisma database schema for users, sessions, accounts, and job applications
- Role-based access control (USER, PREMIUM, ADMIN)
- Password reset functionality with cryptographically secure tokens
- Protected route middleware and authentication UI components
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 42 out of 45 changed files in this pull request and generated 21 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| services/dashboard-service/src/lib/auth.ts | NextAuth configuration with OAuth providers and credentials authentication |
| services/dashboard-service/src/lib/auth-utils.ts | Authentication utilities for user creation, password reset, and session management |
| services/dashboard-service/src/middleware.ts | Route protection middleware with role-based access control |
| services/dashboard-service/prisma/schema.prisma | Database schema for users, OAuth accounts, sessions, profiles, and job applications |
| services/dashboard-service/src/components/auth/*.tsx | React components for sign in, sign up, OAuth buttons, and user menu |
| services/dashboard-service/src/app/auth/*/page.tsx | Authentication pages (sign in, sign up, forgot password, error handling) |
| services/dashboard-service/src/app/api/auth/*/route.ts | API routes for registration, password reset, and NextAuth handler |
| services/dashboard-service/src/app/(protected)/* | Protected dashboard and settings pages with authentication requirements |
| services/auth-service/src/index.ts | Express server setup with CORS and error handling for auth service |
| services/auth-service/src/services/*.ts | JWT generation/verification, password hashing, and email service stubs |
| services/auth-service/src/middleware/*.ts | JWT authentication and role-based authorization middleware |
| services/auth-service/src/routes/*.ts | REST API routes for registration, login, token refresh, and user management |
| services/dashboard-service/package.json | Added auth dependencies: next-auth, bcryptjs, Prisma, zod |
| services/auth-service/package.json | Auth service dependencies: express, jsonwebtoken, bcryptjs, zod |
| services/dashboard-service/.env.example | Environment variable templates for OAuth, JWT, database, and email |
| services/dashboard-service/jest.config.js | Fixed typo: moduleNameMapping → moduleNameMapper |
| .gitignore | Updated to exclude lib directories except src/lib |
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Login | ||
| router.post('/login', async (req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> => { |
Copilot
AI
Nov 26, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No rate limiting is implemented for authentication endpoints. This makes the service vulnerable to brute-force attacks on login, registration, and password reset endpoints. Consider adding rate limiting middleware using packages like express-rate-limit:
import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit';
const authLimiter = rateLimit({
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes
max: 5, // 5 requests per window
message: 'Too many attempts, please try again later',
});
router.post('/login', authLimiter, async (req, res) => { ... });| res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid email or password' }); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify password | ||
| const isValid = await verifyPassword(data.password, user.password); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!isValid) { | ||
| res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid email or password' }); |
Copilot
AI
Nov 26, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The error messages "Invalid email or password" for both non-existent users and incorrect passwords correctly prevent user enumeration. However, the earlier timing attack vulnerability (checking user existence before password verification) undermines this protection. Ensure the timing attack issue is addressed for this security measure to be effective.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@copilot apply changes based on this feedback
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The timing attack vulnerability was already fixed in commit abdf15c. The login endpoint now always performs password verification regardless of whether the user exists, ensuring constant-time behavior.
| export const authOptions: NextAuthOptions = { | ||
| adapter: PrismaAdapter(prisma) as Adapter, |
Copilot
AI
Nov 26, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing validation for the NEXTAUTH_SECRET environment variable. NextAuth.js requires this to be set and will fail in production without it. Add validation in the auth configuration or at application startup to fail fast if the secret is missing:
if (!process.env.NEXTAUTH_SECRET) {
throw new Error('NEXTAUTH_SECRET environment variable is required');
}This should be checked before exporting authOptions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@copilot apply changes based on this feedback
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NextAuth.js already validates NEXTAUTH_SECRET internally at runtime and provides clear error messages when it's missing. Adding a separate validation check caused issues during the Next.js build process since the code runs during static analysis. The framework's built-in validation handles this case correctly in production environments.
services/dashboard-service/src/app/api/auth/forgot-password/route.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| "build": "tsc", | ||
| "start": "node dist/index.js", | ||
| "lint": "eslint src --ext .ts", | ||
| "test": "jest" |
Copilot
AI
Nov 26, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The auth-service has no test coverage despite having a test script configured in package.json. Critical authentication logic in routes, middleware, and services (JWT generation, password verification, authorization) should have comprehensive test coverage. Consider adding tests for:
- Token generation and verification
- Password hashing and validation
- Authentication middleware
- Authorization middleware
- API endpoints (register, login, refresh)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@copilot apply changes based on this feedback
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added comprehensive test coverage for auth-service in commit 36f6834:
- JWT tests: Token generation, verification, decoding, and expiration checking (10 tests)
- Password tests: Hashing, verification, and password strength validation (9 tests)
- Authorization middleware tests: Role-based access control (10 tests)
All 29 tests pass successfully.
| model Account { | ||
| id String @id @default(cuid()) | ||
| userId String | ||
| type String | ||
| provider String | ||
| providerAccountId String | ||
| refresh_token String? @db.Text | ||
| access_token String? @db.Text | ||
| expires_at Int? | ||
| token_type String? | ||
| scope String? | ||
| id_token String? @db.Text | ||
| session_state String? | ||
|
|
||
| user User @relation(fields: [userId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade) | ||
|
|
||
| @@unique([provider, providerAccountId]) | ||
| } |
Copilot
AI
Nov 26, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The Account model is missing an index on the userId field. Since this is a foreign key that will be frequently queried when fetching user accounts, it should be indexed for better performance:
model Account {
// ... other fields
user User @relation(fields: [userId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade)
@@unique([provider, providerAccountId])
@@index([userId])
}The same applies to the Session model's userId field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@copilot apply changes based on this feedback
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Database indexes were already added in commit abdf15c:
@@index([userId])on Account model@@index([userId])on Session model@@index([userId]),@@index([status]), and@@index([userId, status])on JobApplication model
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
…ute.ts Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
|
Looks like there are a few issues preventing this PR from being merged!
If you'd like me to help, just leave a comment, like Feel free to include any additional details that might help me get this PR into a better state. You can manage your notification settings |
|
@OpenHands please fix the failing actions on PR #40 at branch |
|
Uh oh! There was an unexpected error starting the job :( |
| GoogleProvider({ | ||
| clientId: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID || '', | ||
| clientSecret: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET || '', | ||
| }), | ||
| GitHubProvider({ | ||
| clientId: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_ID || '', | ||
| clientSecret: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET || '', | ||
| }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| GoogleProvider({ | |
| clientId: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID || '', | |
| clientSecret: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET || '', | |
| }), | |
| GitHubProvider({ | |
| clientId: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_ID || '', | |
| clientSecret: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET || '', | |
| }), | |
| ...(process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID && process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET | |
| ? [ | |
| GoogleProvider({ | |
| clientId: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID, | |
| clientSecret: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET, | |
| }), | |
| ] | |
| : []), | |
| ...(process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_ID && process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET | |
| ? [ | |
| GitHubProvider({ | |
| clientId: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_ID, | |
| clientSecret: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET, | |
| }), | |
| ] | |
| : []), |
OAuth credentials fallback to empty strings, which will cause authentication to silently fail without proper error handling, potentially leaving users unable to sign in via OAuth.
View Details
Analysis
OAuth provider configurations silently fail with missing credentials
What fails: GoogleProvider and GitHubProvider in services/dashboard-service/src/lib/auth.ts (lines 41-46) accept empty string fallbacks for clientId and clientSecret environment variables, causing OAuth sign-in attempts to fail without early detection.
How to reproduce:
- Deploy without setting
GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID,GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET,GITHUB_CLIENT_ID, orGITHUB_CLIENT_SECRETenvironment variables - Application starts successfully with no errors
- User clicks "Sign in with Google" or "Sign in with GitHub"
- User receives error from OAuth provider:
[next-auth][error][SIGNIN_OAUTH_ERROR]- "invalid_client"
Result: OAuth sign-in fails at runtime when users attempt to use it, rather than failing during deployment when missing credentials are detected.
Expected: Only OAuth providers with valid credentials should be configured. Missing credentials should not silently create providers with empty values.
How fixed: Changed provider configuration to conditionally include providers only when BOTH clientId and clientSecret environment variables are present:
- Uses spread operator with ternary:
...(condition ? [provider] : []) - Removed
|| ''fallback that allowed empty string credentials - Follows NextAuth.js official examples which pass
process.env.VARIABLEdirectly without fallbacks
| // Always verify password to mitigate timing attacks | ||
| const passwordHash = user ? user.password : await hashPassword('dummy'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Password verification timing attack mitigation has unnecessary overhead - the code always hashes a dummy password even for existing users, which is computationally expensive and could cause performance issues.
View Details
📝 Patch Details
diff --git a/services/auth-service/src/routes/auth.ts b/services/auth-service/src/routes/auth.ts
index 3d53392..38b4555 100644
--- a/services/auth-service/src/routes/auth.ts
+++ b/services/auth-service/src/routes/auth.ts
@@ -16,6 +16,13 @@ const users: Map<string, {
createdAt: Date;
}> = new Map();
+// Pre-computed dummy hash for timing attack mitigation
+// Computed at module load time to avoid hashing overhead on every failed login
+let dummyPasswordHash: string;
+(async () => {
+ dummyPasswordHash = await hashPassword('dummy-user-for-timing-safety');
+})();
+
// Validation schemas
const registerSchema = z.object({
email: z.string().email('Invalid email address'),
@@ -102,7 +109,8 @@ router.post('/login', async (req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> => {
const user = users.get(data.email);
// Always verify password to mitigate timing attacks
- const passwordHash = user ? user.password : await hashPassword('dummy');
+ // Use pre-computed dummy hash for non-existent users to avoid hashing overhead
+ const passwordHash = user ? user.password : dummyPasswordHash;
const isValid = await verifyPassword(data.password, passwordHash);
if (!user || !isValid) {
Analysis
Inefficient dummy password hashing in login endpoint adds ~300ms latency per failed login
What fails: The login endpoint in services/auth-service/src/routes/auth.ts (lines 104-105) hashes a dummy password on every failed login attempt for non-existent users, adding unnecessary computational overhead (~306ms per request).
How to reproduce:
// In auth.ts login route:
const passwordHash = user ? user.password : await hashPassword('dummy');
// When user doesn't exist, this hashes 'dummy' password on every requestMeasured with bcryptjs v2.4.3 using SALT_ROUNDS=12:
- Hashing dummy password: ~306ms per request
- Total overhead for non-existent user login attempt: ~623ms (hash + verify)
Result: Non-existent user login attempts take ~313ms longer than necessary
Expected: The dummy hash should be pre-computed at module load time to eliminate per-request hashing overhead while maintaining timing attack mitigation.
Fix applied:
- Pre-compute the dummy password hash at module initialization
- Use the cached hash for all non-existent user login attempts
- Result: Non-existent user login attempts now take ~307ms (verify only, no hashing)
- Performance improvement: ~313ms faster per failed login for non-existent users
- Timing attack protection: Unchanged - still provides constant-time comparison
This optimization aligns with security best practices for timing attack mitigation which recommend always calling verification with a valid hash, but doesn't require re-computing it on every request.
Co-authored-by: groupthinking <[email protected]>
Applied all security improvements and code cleanup based on the review comments in commit Security fixes:
Database optimization:
Code cleanup:
Warning Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
|
…dation Co-authored-by: groupthinking <[email protected]>
|
Just as a heads up, I was blocked by some firewall rules while working on your feedback. Expand below for details. Warning Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
|
|
|
||
| export default function SettingsPage() { | ||
| const { data: session, update } = useSession(); | ||
| const [name, setName] = useState(session?.user?.name || ''); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The name state is initialized from the session during component mount, but won't update when the session data loads asynchronously, leaving the form field empty even after the session is available.
View Details
📝 Patch Details
diff --git a/services/dashboard-service/src/app/(protected)/settings/page.tsx b/services/dashboard-service/src/app/(protected)/settings/page.tsx
index 6ca3fe9..ec22c01 100644
--- a/services/dashboard-service/src/app/(protected)/settings/page.tsx
+++ b/services/dashboard-service/src/app/(protected)/settings/page.tsx
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
'use client';
import { useSession } from 'next-auth/react';
-import { useState } from 'react';
+import { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
export default function SettingsPage() {
const { data: session, update } = useSession();
@@ -9,6 +9,12 @@ export default function SettingsPage() {
const [saving, setSaving] = useState(false);
const [message, setMessage] = useState('');
+ useEffect(() => {
+ if (session?.user?.name) {
+ setName(session.user.name);
+ }
+ }, [session?.user?.name]);
+
const handleSubmit = async (e: React.FormEvent) => {
e.preventDefault();
setSaving(true);
Analysis
Form field remains empty even after session loads in settings page
What fails: The name input field on the settings page (services/dashboard-service/src/app/(protected)/settings/page.tsx, line 8) initializes to an empty string when the component first renders because the useSession() hook hasn't retrieved session data yet. When the session later loads asynchronously, the name state doesn't update, leaving the form field empty despite the session containing the user's name.
How to reproduce:
- Navigate to the settings page (
/settings) as an authenticated user - Observe the Name input field appears empty initially
- Wait for the session to load asynchronously
- The Name field remains empty even though
session.user.nameis now available
Result: User sees an empty text input field in the "Name" section despite being logged in with a name in their session
Expected: According to React's useState documentation, the initial value parameter is only evaluated during the first render and is ignored on subsequent renders. Since the initial value depends on session (which is undefined on first render), the state never updates when the session data becomes available later.
Solution: Added a useEffect hook that syncs the name state when session.user.name changes:
useEffect(() => {
if (session?.user?.name) {
setName(session.user.name);
}
}, [session?.user?.name]);This pattern is consistent with the codebase's other usage of useSession (see UserMenu.tsx for status checking pattern) and ensures the form field displays the user's name once the session is available.
Code Review Changes Applied
Original prompt
Objective
Add secure user authentication and account management for the AJOB4AGENT dashboard and API services, enabling multi-user support for the SaaS platform.
Related Issue
Closes #29
Requirements
Technical Specifications
Directory Structure
Database Schema (Prisma)