Update api_health_checker.py #6
Conversation
|
This repository is associated with groupthinking whose free trial has ended. Subscribe at jazzberry.ai. |
|
""" WalkthroughThe code was refactored from a standalone function with hardcoded API endpoints to a parameterized function that receives endpoints from the protocol context. The new implementation uses a dictionary to store results, handles request exceptions more granularly, and returns a simplified result format without aggregated metrics. Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (2)📓 Common learningsprotocols/api_health_checker.py (1)🪛 Flake8 (7.2.0)protocols/api_health_checker.py[error] 4-4: expected 2 blank lines, found 1 (E302) 🔇 Additional comments (4)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR refactors the API health checker into a protocol-compatible execute function that reads endpoints from protocol_context and improves error handling.
- Replaces standalone
task()withexecute(protocol_context)signature and context-driven endpoints - Introduces specific exception handlers (
Timeout,ConnectionError,RequestException) - Simplifies result structure to a status map and unified return object
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)
protocols/api_health_checker.py:8
- Add a docstring or comment describing the expected format of
api_endpoints(e.g., list of URL strings) so callers know how to structure the context.
api_endpoints = protocol_context.get("api_endpoints")
protocols/api_health_checker.py:15
- [nitpick] Currently
endpointis treated as a URL string; consider supporting richer endpoint objects (withnameandurl) or documenting that only URLs are accepted to avoid confusion.
response = requests.get(endpoint, timeout=10)
protocols/api_health_checker.py:17
- [nitpick] The key
statusCodemixes camelCase with snake_case keys (status); consider using a consistent naming convention (e.g.,status_code) for clarity.
results[endpoint] = {"status": "ok", "statusCode": response.status_code}
protocols/api_health_checker.py:4
- Add unit tests for
execute, including cases for successful checks, timeouts, connection errors, and generic request exceptions to ensure full coverage of new logic.
def execute(protocol_context):
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @groupthinking, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a significant refactoring of the API health checker. The primary goal is to make the health check mechanism more flexible, robust, and integrated into a broader protocol execution framework. It achieves this by externalizing endpoint configuration, enhancing error handling for network requests, and simplifying the output for clearer status reporting.
Highlights
- Function Signature and Input: The core logic has been refactored from a standalone
task()function to anexecute(protocol_context)function. This change allows the API endpoints to be dynamically provided via theprotocol_contextdictionary, making the health checker more configurable and reusable. - Enhanced Error Handling: The exception handling has been significantly improved. Instead of a generic
except Exception as e, the code now specifically catchesrequests.exceptions.Timeout,requests.exceptions.ConnectionError, and a generalrequests.exceptions.RequestException. This provides more granular feedback on the nature of API call failures. Additionally,response.raise_for_status()was added to automatically raise an exception for bad HTTP status codes (4xx or 5xx). - Simplified Output Structure: The return format has been streamlined. The previous output included various metrics like
success,action,total_endpoints,healthy_count, andfailure_count. The new structure returns a simple dictionary with astatus(e.g., 'completed', 'error') and aresultsdictionary, mapping each endpoint URL to its specific health status and any associated error messages. - Removed Time Tracking: The explicit tracking of response time using the
timemodule has been removed, simplifying the health check logic to focus solely on connectivity and status.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the api_health_checker protocol, making it more generic and robust. Key improvements include fetching endpoints from a context dictionary instead of hardcoding them, and more specific exception handling for network requests.
My review identifies a critical issue where a function rename will break the protocol loading mechanism. I've also included medium-severity recommendations to improve the function's docstring for better clarity and to make the request timeout configurable for greater flexibility.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
protocols/api_health_checker.py (1)
15-17: Consider the appropriateness of the 10-second timeout value.The hardcoded 10-second timeout may not be suitable for all API endpoints. Consider making this configurable through the protocol context.
- response = requests.get(endpoint, timeout=10) + timeout = protocol_context.get("timeout", 10) + response = requests.get(endpoint, timeout=timeout)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
protocols/api_health_checker.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.py`: Follow PEP8, use 'black' and 'flake8' for code formatting and linting.
**/*.py: Follow PEP8, use 'black' and 'flake8' for code formatting and linting.
📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CONTRIBUTING.md)
List of files the instruction was applied to:
protocols/api_health_checker.py
🪛 Flake8 (7.2.0)
protocols/api_health_checker.py
[error] 4-4: expected 2 blank lines, found 1
(E302)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
protocols/api_health_checker.py (4)
2-2: Good practice: Import specific exceptions for better error handling.The addition of specific exception imports (
RequestException,Timeout,ConnectionError) improves the granularity of exception handling and makes the code more maintainable.
5-11: Robust parameter validation with clear error messaging.The parameter validation logic correctly handles the case where no API endpoints are provided and returns a consistent error response format.
18-24: Well-structured exception handling with appropriate granularity.The exception handling correctly distinguishes between different types of request failures (
Timeout,ConnectionError,RequestException) and provides meaningful error messages for each case. The hierarchy from most specific to most general exceptions is properly implemented.
25-25: Consistent return format enhances API predictability.The return value maintains a consistent structure with
statusandresultsfields, making it easier for consumers to process the response.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Pull Request
Description
Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Also include relevant motivation and context.
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Checklist
Screenshots (if applicable)
Additional context
Summary by CodeRabbit