Fix name Styled Components technology name inconsistency for Home Unite Us

[MStoutTech]

Fixes #8571

What changes did you make?

• Removed "Style Components" from tools
• Added updated name "Styled Components" to technologies

Why did you make the changes (we will use this info to test)?

• Keep terminology of tools and technologies consistent and updated
• Update the name of the technology for accuracy

CodeQL Alerts

After the PR has been submitted and the resulting GitHub actions/checks have been completed, developers should check the PR for CodeQL alert annotations.

Check the PR's comments. If present on your PR, the CodeQL alert looks similar as shown

Please let us know that you have checked for CodeQL alerts. Please do not dismiss alerts.

• I have checked this PR for CodeQL alerts and none were found.
• I found CodeQL alert(s), and (select one):
  • I have resolved the CodeQL alert(s) as noted
  • I believe the CodeQL alert(s) is a false positive (Merge Team will evaluate)
  • I have followed the Instructions below, but I am still stuck (Merge Team will evaluate)

Instructions for resolving CodeQL alerts

If CodeQL alert/annotations appear, refer to How to Resolve CodeQL alerts.

In general, CodeQL alerts should be resolved prior to PR reviews and merging

Screenshots of Proposed Changes To The Website (if any, please do not include screenshots of code changes)

Visuals before changes are applied

Visuals after changes are applied

[github-actions]

Want to review this pull request? Take a look at this documentation for a step by step guide!

---

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.

git checkout -b MStoutTech-fix-name-inconsistency-home-unite-us-8571 gh-pages
git pull https://github.com/MStoutTech/HackforLAwebsite.git fix-name-inconsistency-home-unite-us-8571

[mocodesss]

ETA: 10/4 EOD
Availability: Weekends, weekdays after 7:30pm

[ldaws003]

Review ETA: 10/3/2026 EOD
Availability: Saturday Morning

[ldaws003]

Hi @MStoutTech , good work on the issue. You setup your branch correctly, and made the requested changes of renaming the Style Components entry and moving it to the technologies variable. Also, the PR was properly made. Approved.

[computarisis]

Hi @MStoutTech! I was able to validate visually your branch locally, and I could see that you correctly addressed the issue by adding 'Styled components' to the technologies variable, and removing it from tools. You also checked off the corresponding instructions items correctly; you also branched and documented the visual changes correctly. Good job!

[mocodesss]

Nice job @MStoutTech! Very clean. thanks you for including those screenshots + I can confirm that change on my own build as well!

[castillios]

Hi @aayush24rai, this PR has enough reviews so I'll be merging it. There's another small PR up & available to review. Reminder to also comment your ETA and availability when you assign yourself to review PRs!