docs: record 6.2.0 publication evidence

[hannsxpeter]

Summary

• mark the 6.2.0 release as published and verified
• record PR, merged-main CI, tag, provenance workflow, registry integrity, GitHub Release, isolated installs, audits, signatures, and attestations
• refresh canonical state, generated views, release Pillars, roadmap, security, and checkpoint evidence

Validation

• version sync, self-truth 140/140, and public surface checks pass
• prepublication gate remains bound to the exact hardening revision
• Pillars, static checks 35/35, event chains, state views, checkpoint, linkage, repo docs, and repo surface checks pass
• git diff --check passes

Published release

• https://github.com/hannsxpeter/godpowers/releases/tag/v6.2.0
• https://github.com/hannsxpeter/godpowers/actions/runs/32242093455

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bd2d6200ed

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Record the actual package-pair verification command

For the package-pair and MCP verification, command is prose rather than an executable command, while the record still asserts exit code 0. A repo-wide search finds no underlying command or retained log, so a maintainer auditing or reproducing this publication closeout cannot determine how the exact pair was installed or how the MCP checks were invoked. Record the actual install and MCP commands, or reference durable execution evidence, instead of this placeholder.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L34-L38

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.