Skip to content

[strategist] planning: release-channels.md — document channel divergence (v4→stable/candidate, v5→edge) (Refs #5687) - #5689

Merged
kubestellar-prow[bot] merged 1 commit into
v4from
strategy/release-channels-divergence
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

[strategist] planning: release-channels.md — document channel divergence (v4→stable/candidate, v5→edge) (Refs #5687)#5689
kubestellar-prow[bot] merged 1 commit into
v4from
strategy/release-channels-divergence

Conversation

@kubestellar-hive

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Updates src/docs/release-channels.md only (the promotion-policy note, the "How channels are published" intro, the branch-restriction line, and the monotonic-tags parenthetical) to reflect current CI reality:

  • v4 docker.yml publishes CHANNELS: "stable,candidate" (three image jobs);
  • v5 docker.yml publishes edge (publish-image-tags.sh … v5 true edge);
  • so edge is now an active-development v5 build, not a synonym for stable.

The doc previously said all three channels retag on every merge to v4 and co-point with v4-latest — contradicting both the workflows and ROADMAP.md's "divergence has begun". The remaining forward-looking caveat (soak/promotion between candidate and stable within the v4 line, #3702) is retained.

Refs #5687

Files/cluster claimed

src/docs/release-channels.md only. Disjoint from open hold PRs #5673 (contributor-relay.md), #5665 (labelPlanSink tests), #5642 (ADOPTERS.md), #5635 (docs/rfc-4002-phased-roadmap.md), #5559 (UPGRADE.md), #4032 (proxy auth).


Hold-gated planning PR by strategist agent (ACMM L5). Do not merge without human review; never remove the hold label.

— hive: agent=strategist backend=copilot model=claude-sonnet-4-6 copilot=1.0.78

…ce (v4→stable/candidate, v5→edge)

The promotion-policy note and publishing section still claimed all three
channels retag on every merge to v4 and co-point with v4-latest. Reality
per docker.yml on each line: v4 publishes stable,candidate; v5 publishes
edge. ROADMAP.md already states divergence has begun; this brings the
operator-facing channel-selection doc in line so nobody puts a production
hive on edge believing it equals stable.

Refs #5687

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sec-check <sec-check@hive.kubestellar.io>
@kubestellar-hive kubestellar-hive Bot added the hold label Sep 2, 2026
@kubestellar-prow kubestellar-prow Bot added dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the DCO. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 2, 2026
@clubanderson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Review — OK (accurate; hold-gated, leaving the hold in place for human sign-off).

Verified the changed claims against both workflows:

  • v4 docker.yml: RELEASE_BRANCH: "v4" + CHANNELS: "stable,candidate" in all three image jobs and the cross-org mirror steps — matches "every merge to v4 retags stable and candidate".
  • v5 docker.yml: all three images invoke publish-image-tags.sh … 'v5' {true|false} 'edge' — matches "every merge to v5 retags edge", so "edge is now an active-development v5 build" is exactly right.
  • The generalized branch-restriction line ("release branches (v4, v5)") and the monotonic-tags parenthetical ("the branch's -latest tag and its channels") both match the per-line publish gating.
  • Retaining the ✨ ci: publish stable/candidate/edge release channels from v4 #3702 caveat narrowed to candidate/stable within the v4 line is the correct residual — that soak step still doesn't exist.

No code change implied: src/pkg/hub/release_channels.go deliberately derives channel→branch by digest resolution rather than a hardcoded mapping, so the pill will start reporting edge (v5) through the existing mechanism with no hub change — the doc stays honest either way.

One non-blocking nit outside the changed hunks, for a follow-up rather than this PR: the "Switching a hive to a channel" section still describes switch-completion as heartbeat tag-match (#3761). Given the upgrading-beat payload is minimal (#5585) and moving-tag deployments are only truly verifiable by digest, that section would benefit from a digest-verification caveat.

@clubanderson clubanderson added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. and removed hold labels Sep 2, 2026
@kubestellar-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubestellar-prow
kubestellar-prow Bot merged commit cb1c126 into v4 Sep 2, 2026
62 of 69 checks passed
@kubestellar-prow
kubestellar-prow Bot deleted the strategy/release-channels-divergence branch September 2, 2026 16:56
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution! Your PR has been merged.

Check out what's new:

Stay connected: Slack #kubestellar-dev | Multi-Cluster Survey

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. copilot dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the DCO. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant