Skip to content

Conversation

skjindal93
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@skjindal93 skjindal93 requested a review from a team October 21, 2022 07:50
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results

21 files  ±0  21 suites  ±0   17s ⏱️ +2s
79 tests ±0  79 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 2731306. ± Comparison against base commit 10375bc.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #147 (2731306) into main (1861f39) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #147   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     81.45%   81.45%           
  Complexity      230      230           
=========================================
  Files            28       28           
  Lines           771      771           
  Branches         60       60           
=========================================
  Hits            628      628           
  Misses           93       93           
  Partials         50       50           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 81.45% <ø> (ø)
unit 68.22% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

hypertrace-documentStore = "0.7.18"

protoc = "3.21.2"
grpc = "1.48.0"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
grpc = "1.48.0"
grpc = "1.50.0"

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
[versions]
hypertrace-serviceFramework = "0.1.43"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

might be worth waiting for the couple pending framework prs

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, that was the plan

hypertrace-grpcUtils = "0.9.0"
hypertrace-documentStore = "0.7.18"

protoc = "3.21.2"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is an older version with vulnerabilities. we've been using 3.21.7 (although looks like 3.21.8 is out now)

protoc = "3.21.2"
grpc = "1.48.0"
mockito = "4.8.1"
jackson = "2.13.4.2"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: this isn't a full jackson version - jackson hotfixes are inconsistent across modules (i.e. most jackson modules don't have a 2.13.4.2, only a 2.13.4). So it works since we only use databind, but probably just want to inline this version there to avoid a mistake in the future (or rename it specifically jacksonDatabind would be fine too)

mockito-junit = { module = "org.mockito:mockito-junit-jupiter", version.ref = "mockito" }

[bundles]
grpc-api = ["grpc-stub", "grpc-protobuf", "javax-annotation"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

grpc-bom got removed, please restore it (and if doing other repos, add it)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fuller explanation of my thinking behind using the grpc bom here - hypertrace/service-framework#56 (comment)

typesafe-config = { module = "com.typesafe:config", version = "1.4.2" }
lombok = { module = "org.projectlombok:lombok", version = "1.18.22" }
slf4j-api = { module = "org.slf4j:slf4j-api", version = "1.7.32" }
apache-log4j-slf4jImpl = { module = "org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j-impl", version = "2.17.1" }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you do a quick check on version numbers. I think a few of these are outdated - log4j, rxjava and lombok at least

@aaron-steinfeld
Copy link
Contributor

Can probably close this :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants