Skip to content

Conversation

@davidatBGU
Copy link

@davidatBGU davidatBGU commented Nov 20, 2025

During the execution found numerous errors:
ib_async.wrapper ERROR: tickString with tickType 88: unhandled value: '1763653969'

Due to unhandled tickType 88

as well tickType 90 was unhandled :
AssertionError: Received tick tickType=90 value=0 but we don't have an attribute mapping for it? Triggered from ticker.contract=Stock(conId=4817283, symbol='RCMT', exchange='NASDAQ', currency='USD', localSymbol='RCMT', tradingClass='NMS')
2025-11-20 17:00:16,731 ib_async.Decoder ERROR: Error for tickGeneric([796, 90, 0.0]):
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/opc/.local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ib_async/decoder.py", line 170, in handler
method(*args)
File "/home/opc/.local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ib_async/wrapper.py", line 1208, in tickGeneric
assert tickType in GENERIC_TICK_MAP, (

AssertionError: Received tick tickType=90 value=0 but we don't have an attribute mapping for it? Triggered from ticker.contract=Stock(conId=4817283, symbol='RCMT', exchange='NASDAQ', currency='USD', localSymbol='RCMT', tradingClass='NMS')
2025-11-20 17:00:16,731 ib_async.Decoder ERROR: Error for tickGeneric([796, 90, 0.0]):
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/opc/.local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ib_async/decoder.py", line 170, in handler
    method(*args)
  File "/home/opc/.local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ib_async/wrapper.py", line 1208, in tickGeneric
    assert tickType in GENERIC_TICK_MAP, (
@davidatBGU davidatBGU changed the title fixed ib_async.wrapper ERROR: tickString with tickType 88: unhandled … fixed ib_async.wrapper ERROR for tickType 88 and 90 Nov 20, 2025
@gnzsnz
Copy link
Contributor

gnzsnz commented Nov 20, 2025

this will help on #182, but is not enough.

GENERIC_TICK_MAP needs to be updated for delayed data. so 90 should be included in GENERIC_TICK_MAP

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants