Skip to content

Conversation

Umekawa
Copy link
Member

@Umekawa Umekawa commented Oct 8, 2025

What

  • Add a dependency on the uri gem to use version 1.0.4 or higher.

Why

Ref

@Umekawa Umekawa self-assigned this Oct 8, 2025
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 8, 2025 03:54
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a security dependency update by requiring the uri gem version 1.0.4 or higher to address a credential leakage vulnerability (CVE-2025-61594) found in earlier versions.

  • Added explicit dependency on uri gem with minimum version constraint

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @Umekawa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to enhance the security posture of the project by updating a critical dependency. It introduces a minimum version requirement for the uri gem to mitigate a known vulnerability that could expose sensitive credentials, ensuring that all future installations and updates will use a secure version of the library.

Highlights

  • Security Update: This pull request addresses a critical security vulnerability (CVE-2025-61594) found in versions 1.0.3 and earlier of the uri gem, which could lead to credential leakage.
  • Dependency Update: A new dependency on the uri gem has been added to the project's gemspec, specifically requiring version 1.0.4 or higher to ensure the patched version is used.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses the security vulnerability in the uri gem by adding a dependency on version 1.0.4 or higher in the gemspec. The change is minimal and correctly placed. However, I've added a suggestion to use a pessimistic version constraint to improve long-term stability and prevent potential issues from future breaking changes in the dependency.

spec.add_dependency "rainbow"
spec.add_dependency "rouge"
spec.add_dependency "slop", "< 4.0.0"
spec.add_dependency "uri", ">= 1.0.4"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While >= 1.0.4 correctly resolves the security vulnerability, it's an open-ended dependency. This could automatically pull in future minor or major versions of uri that might introduce breaking changes, affecting the stability of this gem for its users. It's generally safer to use a pessimistic version constraint to limit the scope of allowed versions. Using ~> 1.0.4 will restrict updates to patch versions (>= 1.0.4 and < 1.1), providing a better balance between security and stability.

  spec.add_dependency "uri", "~> 1.0.4"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since it's a library, I don't think there's a strong need to pessimistic version.

@Umekawa Umekawa requested review from P-SiZK and acronhub and removed request for P-SiZK October 8, 2025 04:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant