Changes from subgroup 2025-05-12

J3-Papers/edits/25-112_misc.txt

@@ -537,18 +537,38 @@ this point.
 
  [317:10+] Insert new paragraphs to address deferred arguments:
 
-   "An entity with a kind-type parameter whose value depends on a
-    deferred argument is only TKR compatible with another entity,
-    if that entity has the same kind-type parameter declared with
+   "A kind-type parameter whose value depends on a deferred argument
+    is only the same as another kind-type parameter declared with
     a syntactically equivalent expression.
 
-    An entity whose rank depends on a deferred argument is only TKR
-    compatible with another entity, if that entity has its rank
+    An entity whose rank depends on a deferred argument only has
+    the same rank as another entity if that entity has its rank
     declared with a syntactically equivalent expression.  If the rank
     of an implied-rank entity is not declared with a rank clause, it
     does not have the same rank as any other entity."
 
+
 { Is "depends on" acceptable terminology here? }
+{ UTI: We should define "syntactically equivalent" }
+{ UTI: Prevent specifying rank and bounds for deferred constants I.e.
+
+DEFERRED INTEGER, PARAMTER :: C(*)
+DEFERRED INTEGER, PARAMETER, RANK(SIZE(C)) :: D(C)
+
+REQUIREMENT R(C, F)
+    DEFERRED INTEGER, PARAMETER :: C
+    DEFERRED INTERFACE
+      INTEGER FUNCTION F(X)
+        INTEGER, RANK(C+1) :: X
+      END FUNCTION
+END REQUIREMENT
+DEFERRED INTEGER, PARAMETER :: A
+DEFERRED INTEGER, PARAMETER, RANK(A) :: B
+REQUIRES R(A, F)
+...
+PRINT *, F(B) ! Should be compile time error
+}
+
 
   NOTE Some examples of implied-rank entities are shown in the
        following example template. C is explicitly declared