Skip to content

docs: link rust cache issue#496

Open
risu729 wants to merge 1 commit into
jdx:mainfrom
risu729:docs/recreate-rust-cache-known-issue
Open

docs: link rust cache issue#496
risu729 wants to merge 1 commit into
jdx:mainfrom
risu729:docs/recreate-rust-cache-known-issue

Conversation

@risu729
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@risu729 risu729 commented May 27, 2026

Summary

Test plan

  • mise run lint
  • git diff --check

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the README.md file to document a known cache interaction issue with Rust when installed via rustup, referencing an external issue for context. There are no review comments to address.

@greptile-apps
Copy link
Copy Markdown

greptile-apps Bot commented May 27, 2026

Greptile Summary

Adds a short "Rust Cache" section to the README documenting the known cache interaction when mise manages Rust via rustup, pointing readers to issue #215 rather than inline-documenting a workaround.

  • Inserts a three-line section under the caching docs with a direct link to the upstream issue for further context.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Documentation-only change with no runtime impact — safe to merge.

The change is a three-line addition to the README that adds a heading and a link to an existing GitHub issue. There is no logic, configuration, or behaviour being altered.

No files require special attention.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
README.md Adds a "Rust Cache" section pointing readers to issue #215 for known cache interaction with rustup-managed Rust installations

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs: link rust cache issue" | Re-trigger Greptile

@risu729 risu729 marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2026 19:39
@risu729 risu729 requested a review from jdx as a code owner May 27, 2026 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant