Skip to content

feat: use --force-with-lease instead of --force #13

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: feat/first-push-choose-remote
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat: use --force-with-lease instead of --force #13

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4254328
feat: use --force-with-lease instead of --force
kiprasmel Mar 29, 2022
99d529b
use --force-if-inclues alongside --force-with-lease
kiprasmel Mar 30, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
26 changes: 24 additions & 2 deletions forcePush.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -44,6 +44,28 @@ export const forcePush: BranchSequencerBase = (argsBase) =>
const branch: Git.Reference = await repo.getCurrentBranch();
const upstreamBranch: Git.Reference | null = await Git.Branch.upstream(branch).catch(() => null);

/**
* TODO work out a good solution because we don't want the user
* to get interrupted while in-between the "push" flow,
* or at least handle it ourselves / ask the user how to continue
*
* maybe need to have a `--push --continue`?
* ugh, starts to get mixed up w/ other commands, idk!
* or could `--continue` be used in any circumstance,
* i.e. both in a rebase setting, and in a push setting?
*
* could maybe utilize --dry-run? or analyze ourselves? idk
*
* needs to be further explored with our `--sync` (TBD)
*
*
* on --force-if-includes, see:
* - `man git-push`
* - https://stackoverflow.com/a/65839129/9285308
* - https://github.com/gitextensions/gitextensions/issues/8753#issuecomment-763390579
*/
const forceWithLeaseOrForce: string = "--force-with-lease --force-if-includes";

if (!upstreamBranch) {
const remotes: string[] = await repo.getRemoteNames();

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -85,11 +107,11 @@ export const forcePush: BranchSequencerBase = (argsBase) =>
remote = answer;
}

const cmd = `push -u ${remote} ${branch.name()} --force`;
const cmd = `push -u ${remote} ${branch.name()} ${forceWithLeaseOrForce}`;
console.log(`running ${cmd}`);
execSyncInRepo(`${argsBase.gitCmd} ${cmd}`);
} else {
execSyncInRepo(`${argsBase.gitCmd} push --force`);
execSyncInRepo(`${argsBase.gitCmd} push ${forceWithLeaseOrForce}`);
}
},
delayMsBetweenCheckouts: 0,
Expand Down