✨ Improve Responsiveness of Action Cells in Table Component on smaller screens

[EstyBiton]

Resolve stacking issue for action cells on smaller screens,in application inventory table and in controls table
Screenshot of the result:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.98%. Comparing base (b654645) to head (bea9194).
Report is 241 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2145      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   39.20%   41.98%   +2.78%     
==========================================
  Files         146      175      +29     
  Lines        4857     5630     +773     
  Branches     1164     1394     +230     
==========================================
+ Hits         1904     2364     +460     
- Misses       2939     3250     +311     
- Partials       14       16       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
client	41.98% <ø> (+2.78%)	⬆️
server	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sjd78]

I verified the change keeps the action buttons aligned properly when the screen gets narrow.

Is there an issue/ticket for this change? Please reference in the PR description.

[rszwajko]

Looks good! However I see some risk of breaking the e2e tests as we change the id of the action cell.
@mguetta1 we cannot run currently e2e in CI due to broken OLM installation scripts. Can you run the CI in tackle-ui-test repo on it?

btw @sjd78 the ids should be unique within the page - this looks like candidate for refactoring. What do you think?

[mguetta1]

@sjd78 It fixes #2111

@rszwajko The OLM installation issue should be fixed by now, I gave it another try

[rszwajko]

@mguetta1
I see the e2e are up and running and they do fail on this PR so we need a fix in the test repo. Otherwise I'm OK with the change.

[mguetta1]

@mguetta1 I see the e2e are up and running and they do fail on this PR so we need a fix in the test repo. Otherwise I'm OK with the change.

Sure, we will take care of that. Thanks!