Skip to content

Conversation

@majin1102
Copy link
Contributor

@majin1102 majin1102 commented Jan 11, 2026

This is the first step of #4779

@majin1102 majin1102 marked this pull request as draft January 11, 2026 14:51
@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 11, 2026
@majin1102 majin1102 force-pushed the namespace-datafusion-rust branch from 6239d73 to fc9064b Compare January 11, 2026 15:27
@majin1102 majin1102 force-pushed the namespace-datafusion-rust branch from fc9064b to 3e79cb1 Compare January 11, 2026 15:28
@majin1102 majin1102 force-pushed the namespace-datafusion-rust branch from 9a7f365 to 958e528 Compare January 12, 2026 04:01
@majin1102
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @wjones127 @jackye1995 @yanghua @westonpace @Xuanwo ,

This PR is driven by #4779. In our production scenario, we’d like to leverage DataFusion to deliver a better SQL experience that supports search, analytics, and AI-related operators (e.g., via UDFs/UDTFs).

I’ve already discussed this with @jackye1995 offline, and we agreed to try this with a dedicated crate for the DataFusion namespace integration. This PR introduces the foundational approach.

I’ll follow up with additional issues covering next steps—such as Python bindings, URL-based tables, SQL extensions, etc.

Please take a look when you have time!

@majin1102 majin1102 marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2026 07:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant