-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
fee: round up transaction weight to the nearest satoshi #987
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @hieblmi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on enhancing the accuracy and reliability of transaction fee calculations throughout the codebase. By switching to a fee estimation method that always rounds up to the nearest satoshi, I've mitigated the risk of transactions being rejected due to insufficient fees, which was a known issue. This ensures more robust and predictable on-chain operations.
Highlights
- Fee Calculation Improvement: I've updated all instances of
FeeForWeight
toFeeForWeightRoundUp
across various modules, includinginstantout
,liquidity
,staticaddr
,sweep
, andsweepbatcher
. This change ensures that transaction fees are consistently rounded up to the nearest satoshi. - Bug Fix and Reliability: This modification directly addresses
https://github.com/lightninglabs/loop/issues/966
by preventing scenarios where a rounded-down transaction weight could lead to undershooting the minimum relay fee, thus improving transaction reliability. - Dependency Update Leverage: The change leverages the
chainfee.FeeForWeightRoundUp
function introduced inlnd v0.19.2-beta
, indicating an update to or compatibility with a newerlnd
version.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses an important issue where transaction fees could be rounded down, potentially causing relay failures. The change to use FeeForWeightRoundUp
across the codebase is a solid fix. The changes are consistent and correctly applied in all relevant files, including tests.
I've identified one area for improvement in sweepbatcher/sweep_batch.go
where a block of code for manual fee rounding has become redundant due to this change. Removing it would improve code clarity.
Overall, this is a great and necessary change.
this commit fixes issue lightninglabs#966
bee08d7
to
13dc36a
Compare
lnd v0.19.2-beta
introducedchainfee.FeeForWeightRoundUp
which helps us fix #966.