-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
WIP: EDGE3D update #478
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
pguthrey
wants to merge
7
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
feature/guthrey1/edge_3d_update
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
WIP: EDGE3D update #478
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c9b19a6
use symmetry for storage on innermost loop (but not outermost)
pguthrey 3298c9a
comments
pguthrey 5e593d5
call symmetric impl
pguthrey 6fe5181
correction, allow for old impl
pguthrey d929e14
whoops
pguthrey 6fd5a72
rm old code
pguthrey 9fea351
comment
pguthrey File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is still a full matrix?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The interface that this is used for requires having a full matrix. However, when we we are computing the work at each quadrature point, we are using a symmetric matrix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can follow up with a study on how beneficial it would be to never create the full matrix. If that is a major impact, that may be enough incentive to rewrite how things are done in the ultimate use case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did a quick study measuring the performance of an impl that has no 12x12 matrices. Its indistinguishable from the performance seen in this MR.