Skip to content

proposal: explore a Vitest reporter without coupling the core #6

Description

@luantaraschi

Goal

Explore how Eventlaw counterexamples could appear naturally in Vitest output while keeping the core independent of test runners.

Questions

  • Is a reporter, matcher, helper, or optional package the smallest useful boundary?
  • How should pass, fail, pending, and vacuous results map to test output?
  • How are minimized traces attached without losing structured data?
  • Can the integration remain an optional subpath with no core dependency?

Deliverable

A design note or minimal spike using a real test. Do not add a runtime dependency to the main eventlaw entry.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    help wantedExtra attention is neededproposalA change to behavior, semantics, or the public API

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions