Goal
Explore how Eventlaw counterexamples could appear naturally in Vitest output while keeping the core independent of test runners.
Questions
- Is a reporter, matcher, helper, or optional package the smallest useful boundary?
- How should pass, fail, pending, and vacuous results map to test output?
- How are minimized traces attached without losing structured data?
- Can the integration remain an optional subpath with no core dependency?
Deliverable
A design note or minimal spike using a real test. Do not add a runtime dependency to the main eventlaw entry.
Goal
Explore how Eventlaw counterexamples could appear naturally in Vitest output while keeping the core independent of test runners.
Questions
Deliverable
A design note or minimal spike using a real test. Do not add a runtime dependency to the main
eventlawentry.