Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Thank you for your submission! Your test file is thorough and well-structured, and the ESLint config is fine. However, the implementation file for the splitInteger function is missing, which is a critical requirement for the task. Please add the actual implementation of splitInteger (e.g., src/splitInteger.js) so your solution can be fully reviewed and approved. You're almost there—just add the missing function and you'll be good to go! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job! 🎉 Your implementation meets all the core requirements: the function returns the correct array, the sum and difference constraints are satisfied, and the output is sorted as required by the task and tests. The previous suggestion to remove sorting was incorrect—since both the requirements and tests expect the output to be sorted in ascending order, your current approach is correct. No further changes are needed. Keep up the good work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| rest -= part; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| parts.sort((a, b) => a - b); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorting the parts array before returning is unnecessary and may cause test failures if the order of parts is important. Please remove this line to return the parts in the order they are calculated.
No description provided.