Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Thanks for your thorough test file! However, the implementation file for the splitInteger function is missing from your pull request, which means the tests can't actually run and the task isn't complete yet. Please add the implementation file so everything can be tested together. You're almost there—great job on the tests, just one more step to finish! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
|
@mateacademy-ai-mentor i dont need to add it to pull request. the function is already in repo. i didn't change it |
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job! 🎉 Your test file for splitInteger is thorough and covers all the required scenarios and constraints. As noted in the review summary, your PR meets all the task requirements, and your approach for a test-only submission is correct since the implementation already exists. No changes are needed—keep up the good work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.