Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your solution is well-structured and the recursive logic is implemented correctly, which is great work! However, a change is needed before this can be approved.
The primary issue is that the createTree function signature in src/scripts/main.js does not match the one specified in the task requirements.
- Required signature:
createTree(element, data) - Your signature:
createTree(element, data, className)
Please remove the extra className parameter to align with the task's specification. Once that's fixed, your solution should be ready to go!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
src/scripts/main.js
Outdated
| const isNonEmptyObject = (value) => | ||
| typeof value === 'object' && value !== null && Object.keys(value).length > 0; | ||
|
|
||
| function createTree(element, data, className) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The task requires the function to have the signature createTree(element, data). Your function includes an extra className parameter. Please adhere to the function signature specified in the requirements.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work on this pull request! I am approving your solution. You've successfully addressed the feedback from the previous review by correcting the createTree function signature. Your recursive logic is implemented correctly, and the code is clean, well-structured, and fully meets all the requirements of the task. Great job!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.