Solution

[Adamur97]

No description provided.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Review Summary

Decision: APPROVE

Reason
Your implementation of validateEmail and the accompanying Jest test suite fully meet the stated requirements:

• The function correctly enforces exactly one @, validates allowed characters, and applies the dot rules for both local and domain parts.
• Edge cases are well covered, including minimal valid examples like t@q.c and invalid formats such as missing dots in the domain or consecutive dots.
• Tests are comprehensive, pass as expected, and use proper Jest syntax.

There are no critical blockers or requirement gaps. Nice work keeping the logic clear and the tests thorough.

Minor (non-blocking) suggestions

• Consider adding brief comments explaining any complex regex or checks to aid future maintainability.
• If you’re curious, you could explore tests for internationalized domains or more RFC-compliant edge cases (not required by this task).

Great job—clean implementation and strong test coverage. Keep it up!

---

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center¹. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

1. Rate AI review example ↩