Solution

[Nazarii84]

No description provided.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Review Summary

Excellent work on the tests for the ifElse function! I am approving your solution as it correctly verifies the core conditional logic and meets the main requirements.

For future improvements, consider making your assertions more specific. The task description mentions that the callbacks should be called with no arguments. While your tests correctly check if the functions are called using toHaveBeenCalled(), you could use toHaveBeenCalledWith() to also verify they were called with no arguments. This would make your tests even more robust and fully aligned with all requirements.

This is a minor point, and your current implementation is solid. Keep up the great work!

---

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center¹. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

1. Rate AI review example ↩

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

These assertions are correct, but they could be more specific. The task description mentions that condition should be called with no arguments (and it's implied for first as well).

To fully test this, you could also:

1. Make condition a jest.fn() to check if it has been called.
2. Use toHaveBeenCalledWith() to verify that both condition and first are called with no arguments.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Similar to the previous test, you can make these assertions more precise. The requirements explicitly state that condition and second should be called with no arguments.

Consider making condition a mock function and using toHaveBeenCalledWith() for both condition and second to ensure they are called correctly.