Updated docs to include remote key-mapping out of sync side effect #9325
Conversation
adeel2023
force-pushed
the
odata-remote-keymapping
branch
from
471b07e to
8941a75
Compare
|
Hi @adeel2023 is this tied to the upcoming 10.22 release, or can it be merged after review? |
|
@quinntracy it can go in 10.23 |
| @@ -193,5 +193,6 @@ Furthermore, external entities cannot be committed. Use the [Send External Objec | |||
| * The **Commit** activity does not work. Use **Send External Object** instead. | |||
| * On pages, the [Save button](/refguide/button-widgets/) and the [Save Changes event](/refguide/on-click-event/#save-changes) do not work when the page contains widgets that update external entities. Call a microflow that persists the changes using **Send External Object** instead. | |||
| * When synchronizing remote entities to an offline-first client while the remote service is offline, the synchronization will fail and users will see an error. | |||
| * Deleting an object of a published entity (which may be consumed as an external entity) and recreating it with the same OData key can lead to discrepencies. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we add how services are supposed to resolve this? e.g. entities that are supposed to be deleted and recreated should use soft delete.
content/en/docs/refguide/modeling/domain-model/entities/external-entities.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @@ -193,5 +193,6 @@ Furthermore, external entities cannot be committed. Use the [Send External Objec | |||
| * The **Commit** activity does not work. Use **Send External Object** instead. | |||
| * On pages, the [Save button](/refguide/button-widgets/) and the [Save Changes event](/refguide/on-click-event/#save-changes) do not work when the page contains widgets that update external entities. Call a microflow that persists the changes using **Send External Object** instead. | |||
| * When synchronizing remote entities to an offline-first client while the remote service is offline, the synchronization will fail and users will see an error. | |||
| * Deleting an object of a published entity (which may be consumed as an external entity) and recreating it with the same OData key can lead to discrepencies. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Deleting an object of a published entity (which may be consumed as an external entity) and recreating it with the same OData key" - I'm not sure readers will understand what this means
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@joostverhoog With your knowledge of the feature, do you have a suggestion on how to reword in a way that makes more sense to the user? Then, we can add the note from aboout how to resolve the problem with a soft delete.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've updated. Have a look now.
No description provided.