-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Update Heltec_T190 and E290 #8768
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| * GPS pins | ||
| */ | ||
|
|
||
| #define GPS_L76K |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heltec vision master doesn't have a built-in GPS so the default should always be not present.
#define GPS_DEFAULT_NOT_PRESENT 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you once again for the reminder. We have upgraded the hardware of the E290 to version V1.0. However, it has not been released yet as we are still in the testing phase. My sincere apologies for not mentioning the hardware changes in the previous description. In the E290 V1.0, we have added a hardware GPS interface.
| /* | ||
| * GPS pins | ||
| */ | ||
| #define GPS_L76K |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heltec vision master doesn't have a built-in GPS so the default should always be not present.
#define GPS_DEFAULT_NOT_PRESENT 1
Hello everyone, I have updated the GPS and rotary encoder configuration for the Heltec-T190, and also added GPS adaptation support for the Heltec-E290.
Update Summary:
Testing Status:
Successfully tested GPS positioning functionality on actual Heltec-T190 hardware
Verified operation response of the rotary encoder on T190
Completed basic GPS module functionality testing for E290
[√] I have tested that my proposed changes behave as described.
[√] I have tested that my proposed changes do not cause any obvious regressions on the following devices: