Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto-generated baselines by 1ES Pipeline Templates #238927

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

microsoft-github-policy-service[bot]

No description provided.

@vs-code-engineering vs-code-engineering bot added this to the January 2025 milestone Jan 28, 2025
@aeschli aeschli requested a review from lszomoru January 28, 2025 08:08
@lszomoru lszomoru requested a review from rzhao271 January 28, 2025 09:08
@lszomoru
Copy link
Member

Adding @rzhao271 as well

rzhao271
rzhao271 previously approved these changes Jan 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@rzhao271 rzhao271 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. These BinSkim results are all on the setup files, though, so I wonder whether fixing them requires modifications to innosetup itself. CC @joaomoreno @deepak1556

@roblourens roblourens assigned lszomoru and unassigned roblourens Jan 29, 2025
@deepak1556
Copy link
Collaborator

What are type of errors are found in the setup file ? we don't own the innosetup binaries, we rely on https://github.com/felicienfrancois/node-innosetup-compiler to use the prebuilt ones and I see the package is a bit outdated. The source of truth is at https://github.com/jrsoftware/issrc, we could build from source and apply any required binskim patches (similar to other prebuilt projects we maintain)

@Bashirsaba

This comment was marked as spam.

@lszomoru lszomoru modified the milestones: January 2025, February 2025 Jan 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants