Skip to content

Conversation

@jpaillard
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@jpaillard jpaillard linked an issue Dec 8, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@jpaillard jpaillard marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 15:01
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.37%. Comparing base (046b214) to head (ae7d59e).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #552   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.37%   98.37%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        1602     1602           
=======================================
  Hits         1576     1576           
  Misses         26       26           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@bthirion bthirion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One suggestion of improvement on notations

are shuffled across samples, independently from the other features.

conditional permutation of a feature
:math:`\tilde X^{(j)}`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wondering whether :math:X^{\pi (j|-j)} wouldn't be clearer then ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Additionally, it would make this different from the knockoff notation. In principle, these are different things.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agreed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[DOC] inconsistencies in the notations of the user guide section 3

3 participants