Skip to content

Conversation

@aquarius-wing
Copy link

Description

Add new servers to help people use actor critic thinking to solve problems, like writing document

Server Details

  • Server:
  • Changes to:

Motivation and Context

Help people writing document better

How Has This Been Tested?

Yes

Breaking Changes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Protocol Documentation
  • My changes follows MCP security best practices
  • I have updated the server's README accordingly
  • I have tested this with an LLM client
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have documented all environment variables and configuration options

Additional context

@olaservo
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the submission @aquarius-wing , could you please put this server code in your own public GitHub repo and then link to it from the Readme community servers list instead?

@aquarius-wing
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the submission @aquarius-wing , could you please put this server code in your own public GitHub repo and then link to it from the Readme community servers list instead?

Sure

@aquarius-wing aquarius-wing force-pushed the feature/add-actor-critic-thinking branch from 41c1a1e to cf64b23 Compare May 26, 2025 07:45
@aquarius-wing aquarius-wing reopened this May 26, 2025
@aquarius-wing
Copy link
Author

@olaservo Hi there, I have been update my PR.

@olaservo
Copy link
Member

olaservo commented Jun 9, 2025

Thanks for your contribution to the servers list. This has been merged in this combined PR: #2007

This is a new process we're trying out, so if you see any issues feel free to re-open the PR and tag me.

@olaservo olaservo closed this Jun 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants