Skip to content

Conversation

@stainless-app
Copy link
Contributor

@stainless-app stainless-app bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Automated Release PR

0.3.0 (2025-12-10)

Full Changelog: v0.2.0...v0.3.0

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

  • use camel casing for all class properties

Features

  • add BaseResponse class for accessing raw responses (b70b4c9)
  • split out services into normal & raw types (a7e26e6)
  • use camel casing for all class properties (fc81f4b)

Chores

  • ensure constant values are marked as optional in array types (50679be)
  • switch from #[Api(optional: true|false)] to #[Required]|#[Optional] for annotations (0b40eda)
  • use $self = clone $this; instead of $obj = clone $this; (a8db5b6)

This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.

The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.

For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.

🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions

@stainless-app stainless-app bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--changes--next branch from c3bf692 to 5f85e0d Compare December 9, 2025 06:10
@stainless-app stainless-app bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--changes--next branch from 5f85e0d to f36c624 Compare December 9, 2025 06:13
@stainless-app stainless-app bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--changes--next branch from f36c624 to 6fc4c4d Compare December 9, 2025 06:14
@stainless-app stainless-app bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--changes--next branch from 6fc4c4d to acb48aa Compare December 10, 2025 06:31
@stainless-app stainless-app bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--changes--next branch from acb48aa to 2154837 Compare December 10, 2025 06:33
@CruelMoney CruelMoney merged commit ee72701 into main Dec 11, 2025
5 checks passed
@stainless-app
Copy link
Contributor Author

stainless-app bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants