-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
Update THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES with new packages and licenses(biosdk-services) #184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ices) Added new third-party package entries for mosip/kattu workflows and updated license information for existing packages. Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <[email protected]>
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. 🗂️ Base branches to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@CodeRabbit please review the changes and the licenses in the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt |
Rate Limit Exceeded@Rakshithasai123 have exceeded the limit for the number of chat messages per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 44 seconds before sending another message. |
|
@CodeRabbit please review the changes and the licenses in the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 10186 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 33 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 23 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 88 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 82 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 130 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 10580 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 23 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 18 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 139 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 847 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2092 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 12321 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 26 @Rakshithasai123, I've reviewed the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt file and the licenses. Here's my analysis: ✅ Positive Findings
|
|
@CodeRabbit please review the changes and the licenses in the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt, and also the licenses that I added |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 4905 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 0 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 628 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 10186 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 958 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1391 @Rakshithasai123, I've completed a thorough review of the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt file. Here's my detailed analysis: ✅ Excellent Work - What's Done Right
|
|
@CodeRabbit please review the changes and the licenses in the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt, and also the licenses that I added |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 19634 @Rakshithasai123, I understand the confusion. Let me clarify what I see: ✅ What You've Successfully AddedYou've added license information (license names, package names, versions, etc.) for 29 packages in the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt file. This looks comprehensive and accurate! Great work on documenting:
❌ The Critical IssueThe
This statement is false and needs to be corrected. 🔍 Understanding the DifferenceThere's a difference between:
When you say "the licenses that I added," you added #1 (information), not #2 (actual license text files). ✅ How to Fix ThisReplace the last paragraph of THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt with: This is standard practice and perfectly acceptable - you don't need to create the license/ directory unless you actually want to include the full text of each license (which would be 20-30 separate files). Would you like me to provide the exact lines to remove and what to add instead? |
|
@CodeRabbit please review the changes and the licenses in the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt and does the dependencies have the exact licenses as we mentioned THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 864 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1326 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 205 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1211 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 6488 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2214 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 385 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 10250 @Rakshithasai123, I've completed a thorough verification of all licenses in your THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt by checking against Maven Central POMs and the actual source repositories. Here's my comprehensive report: 🚨 CRITICAL ERRORS FOUND - Action Required❌ Error 1: mosip/kattu Workflows (All 7 Entries)Documented: MIT License The mosip/kattu repository is licensed under CC0-1.0, NOT MIT. This is a public domain dedication, which is different from MIT. All 7 workflow entries need correction. Correction needed: ❌ Error 2: Git Commit ID PluginPackage: pl.project13.maven:git-commit-id-plugin v3.0.1 This is a significant error as LGPL-3.0 is a copyleft license with different terms than Apache 2.0. Correction needed: ✅ VERIFIED CORRECT LicensesThe following packages have accurate license information:
|
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <[email protected]>
|
@CodeRabbit please review the changes and the licenses in the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt and does the dependencies have the exact licenses as we mentioned THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 10342 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1748 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1524 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 839 @Rakshithasai123, I've completed another thorough verification. Great progress on fixing some issues! However, there are 2 remaining errors that need correction: 🎉 What You Fixed Correctly
Excellent work on these corrections! 🚨 2 Remaining Errors - Action Required❌ Error 1: mosip/kattu Workflows (All 7 Entries)Current: MIT License The mosip/kattu repository's actual LICENSE file clearly states "CC0 1.0 Universal", not MIT. All 7 workflow entries need this correction: Lines to update:
Change from: Change to: ❌ Error 2: Lombok (Line 138)Current: CC0-1.0 (Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal) Lombok's Maven POM explicitly states "The MIT License", not CC0-1.0. It appears you may have accidentally swapped the mosip/kattu license with Lombok's license. Change from: Change to: ✅ Verified Correct (No Changes Needed)The following packages all have accurate license information:
|
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <[email protected]>
|
@CodeRabbit please review the changes and the licenses in the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt and does the dependencies have the exact licenses as we mentioned THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 12984 @Rakshithasai123, I've completed a comprehensive verification of all licenses in your THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt. Here's my detailed report: 🎉 Great Progress - What You Fixed!Excellent work on correcting these issues from my previous reviews:
🚨 1 CRITICAL ERROR Remaining - Action Required❌ mosip/kattu Workflows (All 7 Entries - Lines 6, 13, 27, 34, 41, 48, 55)Current in your file: I've verified this directly from:
All 7 workflow entries need this correction: Change from: Change to: Affected workflows:
✅ All Other Licenses VERIFIED CORRECT (22 packages)The following packages have accurate license information:
|
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <[email protected]>
|
@CodeRabbit please review the changes and the licenses in the THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt and does the dependencies have the exact licenses as we mentioned THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 14558 @Rakshithasai123, Excellent work! 🎉 I've completed a comprehensive final verification of all licenses in your THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt file. ✅ ALL LICENSES ARE NOW CORRECT! - 100% AccurateYou've successfully fixed all the critical errors from previous reviews: Fixed Issues:
📊 Complete Verification SummaryAll 29 packages have accurate license information: Workflows (7):
Dependencies (22):
📝 Minor Optional ImprovementThe last paragraph still mentions the
Optional suggestion: You could simplify this to: However, since you also mention "or the original source of each package," this is no longer a critical issue—just a minor cleanup opportunity. 🎯 Final Status✅ APPROVED - All licenses are accurate and properly documented! Great job on thoroughly researching and correcting all the license information. Your THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt file now provides accurate attribution for all dependencies and workflows! 🚀 🎉 All licenses verified and correct! 🎉 If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X? Thank you for using CodeRabbit! |
|
Rakshithasai123_biosdk-services_79256d.json Your responsibilities: ────────────────────────────────────────
For every dependency found, verify:
──────────────────────────────────────── ✔ Package name matches the actual pom.xml / module POM dependency Do not accept inferred or guessed licenses or versions unless confirmed from authoritative official sources. ────────────────────────────────────────
For each of these, also confirm that:
──────────────────────────────────────── Validate:
Report any differences across: ────────────────────────────────────────
Ensure the license text and identifier in THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt is EXACT and compliant with the official SPDX definition for that license. ──────────────────────────────────────── • Dependencies present in pom.xml or SBOM but missing in THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt ──────────────────────────────────────── ✔ 100% accurate Please output your findings in a clear, structured format suitable for immediate PR updates. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 21627 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 10973 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 140 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 12366 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 5841 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 156 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 607 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 4232 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2283 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2428 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 658 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 789 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 150 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 685 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 512 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 407 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2106 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 336 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 979 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2056 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 15589 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 7598 @Rakshithasai123, I have completed a comprehensive legal compliance, accuracy, and metadata validation of your THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt file against pom.xml, SBOM, and official license sources. Here are the results: 📊 VALIDATION STATUS: ❌ FAILED - Critical Issues FoundSummary
🚨 CRITICAL ISSUES (MUST FIX)3 Packages Completely Missing from THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txtThese packages are present in both pom.xml and SBOM but are NOT documented in NOTICES: ❌ Missing Package #1: JaCoCo Maven Plugin❌ Missing Package #2: SonarQube Maven Plugin❌ Missing Package #3: Sonatype Central Publishing Maven Plugin
|
|
@CodeRabbit which of these libraries need or mandatory a copyright test? Also, give the files what is the copyright year and date who is the copyright for, like Lombok, Junit, or Sonar, like that |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2588 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 983 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1521 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 7374 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 4843 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1998 @Rakshithasai123, I've completed a comprehensive analysis of copyright requirements for all 32 packages in your project. Here's the detailed breakdown: 📋 COPYRIGHT REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY✅ 25 packages REQUIRE copyright notices❌ 7 packages DO NOT require copyright notices (CC0-1.0 public domain)🔴 MANDATORY COPYRIGHT NOTICES BY LICENSE TYPE1. MIT License (1 package) - Copyright REQUIRED
Required Copyright Notice: 2. Apache-2.0 License (15 packages) - Copyright REQUIREDPer Section 4a of Apache License 2.0: "You must retain... all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices"
Required Apache-2.0 License Text (First 200 words): 3. Eclipse Public License 2.0 (2 packages) - Copyright REQUIRED
Required EPL-2.0 License Text (Header): JaCoCo Specific Notice: 4. GNU LGPL-3.0 License (2 packages) - Copyright REQUIRED
Required LGPL-3.0 License Text (Header): 5. Mozilla Public License 2.0 (4 packages) - Copyright REQUIREDPer Section 3.3 of MPL-2.0: "You must retain copyright and license notices"
Required MPL-2.0 License Text (Header): 6. CDDL-1.1 / GPL-2.0 with Classpath Exception (2 packages) - Copyright REQUIRED
Required CDDL-1.1 Notice: Required GPL-2.0 with Classpath Exception: ✅ NO COPYRIGHT ATTRIBUTION REQUIRED (7 packages)CC0-1.0 (Creative Commons Zero) - Public Domain Dedication
Explanation: CC0-1.0 is a public domain dedication. The copyright holder has waived all copyright and related rights. No attribution is legally required. 📊 SUMMARY TABLE
🎯 RECOMMENDATIONSPriority Actions:
Sample Format for THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.txt:Would you like me to:
|
|
@CodeRabbit which of these libraries need or mandatory a copyright test? Also, give the files what is the copyright year and date who is the copyright for, like Lombok, Junit, or Sonar, like that |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 61704 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 5851 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 236 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 3910 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 59 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2004 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 232 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 3681 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 3988 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 5513 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1673 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1920 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 220 @Rakshithasai123, I've completed a comprehensive analysis of the mosip-functional-tests repository SBOM. Here's your complete COPYRIGHT NOTICES document in the exact format you requested: 📊 Summary StatisticsTotal Packages Analyzed: 99 Copyright Attribution Required:
Total requiring copyright: 91 packages No Copyright Attribution Required:
Would you like me to:
|
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <[email protected]>
Added new third-party package entries for mosip/kattu workflows and updated license information for existing packages.