Skip to content

Conversation

@weshinsley
Copy link
Contributor

@weshinsley weshinsley commented Oct 22, 2025

This wires in acme-buddy, via constellation, for packit deployments.

@weshinsley weshinsley changed the title Mrc 6805 Use lets-encrypt for certs Oct 22, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (f8a97b6) to head (310c8ae).
⚠️ Report is 24 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #32   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            4         4           
  Lines          375       379    +4     
  Branches        38        40    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits           375       379    +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@weshinsley weshinsley marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2025 15:29
Copy link
Contributor

@EmmaLRussell EmmaLRussell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this is quite tricky to test manually! Is there a staging environment for ncov where we can test this? Can it be tested locally?

You'll need to bump up the version in src/packit_deploy/__about__.py
Also, should update the "complete" config (for local testing if possible).

@david-mears-2
Copy link
Contributor

For https://github.com/ncov-ic/ncov-packit/ I get a 404 page (permissions?) so I'm quite unsure of the context of this change... what does using LetsEncrypt achieve?

@weshinsley weshinsley marked this pull request as draft November 26, 2025 22:10
@weshinsley weshinsley marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2025 17:38
Comment on lines +16 to +17
if cfg.use_acme: # pragma: no cover
vault.resolve_secrets(cfg.acme_config, cfg.vault.client())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For another time - if constellation's AcmeBuddyConfig had been a dataclass you would get this for free now: reside-ic/constellation#38

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice - I'll do that...

@weshinsley weshinsley merged commit e317675 into main Dec 4, 2025
8 checks passed
@weshinsley weshinsley deleted the mrc-6805 branch December 4, 2025 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants