Skip to content

Conversation

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 8, 2026

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #5565

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated styling for badge links in the README to improve presentation.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 8, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Walkthrough

README.md badges are enhanced with consistent inline CSS styling (text-decoration: none;) applied to center badge section anchor tags, standardizing the visual presentation of badge links across the documentation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Styling
README.md
Added inline CSS style text-decoration: none; to badge anchor tags in the center badge section (+7/-7 lines). Updates link presentation for visual consistency without altering content or behavior.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 Our badges now sport a refined, dashing look,
With CSS flourishes straight from the style book,
No underlines dance where they shouldn't appear,
Consistency blooms, elegant and clear! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly references the linked issue (#5565) and accurately describes the main change: updating README.md badge links with consistent styling.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully implements the objective from issue #5565: standardizing badge links in README.md with consistent inline CSS styling applied to anchor tags.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are scoped to README.md badge link styling as specified in issue #5565; no unrelated modifications to other files or functionality are present.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

7-15: Incomplete badge styling standardization across sections.

The PR objective aims to "standardize badge links with consistent styling," but the inline CSS style text-decoration: none; has been applied only to the navigation badges (lines 29-50). The top badge section (lines 7-15: GitHub last commit, Crates.io, Docs.rs, etc.) still lacks this consistent styling.

For true visual coherence, consider applying the same inline style to the top badges to achieve complete standardization across all badge sections.

♻️ Proposed fix to standardize all badge links

Apply style="text-decoration: none;" to all badge anchor tags in the top section (lines 7-15):

-[![GitHub last commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/mxsm/rocketmq-rust)](https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/commits/main)
-[![Crates.io](https://img.shields.io/crates/v/rocketmq-rust.svg)](https://crates.io/crates/rocketmq-rust)
-[![Docs.rs](https://docs.rs/rocketmq-rust/badge.svg)](https://docs.rs/rocketmq-rust)
-[![CI](https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/workflows/CI/badge.svg)](https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/actions)
-[![CodeCov][codecov-image]][codecov-url] [![GitHub contributors](https://img.shields.io/github/contributors/mxsm/rocketmq-rust)](https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/graphs/contributors) [![Crates.io License](https://img.shields.io/crates/l/rocketmq-rust)](#license)
+<a href="https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/commits/main" style="text-decoration: none;">[![GitHub last commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/mxsm/rocketmq-rust)](https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/commits/main)</a>
+<a href="https://crates.io/crates/rocketmq-rust" style="text-decoration: none;">[![Crates.io](https://img.shields.io/crates/v/rocketmq-rust.svg)](https://crates.io/crates/rocketmq-rust)</a>
+<a href="https://docs.rs/rocketmq-rust" style="text-decoration: none;">[![Docs.rs](https://docs.rs/rocketmq-rust/badge.svg)](https://docs.rs/rocketmq-rust)</a>
+<a href="https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/actions" style="text-decoration: none;">[![CI](https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/workflows/CI/badge.svg)](https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/actions)</a>
+<a href="[codecov-url]" style="text-decoration: none;">[![CodeCov][codecov-image]][codecov-url]</a> <a href="https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/graphs/contributors" style="text-decoration: none;">[![GitHub contributors](https://img.shields.io/github/contributors/mxsm/rocketmq-rust)](https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/graphs/contributors)</a> <a href="#license" style="text-decoration: none;">[![Crates.io License](https://img.shields.io/crates/l/rocketmq-rust)](#license)</a>

Also applies to: 29-50

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29bfd58 and 66c9aa7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
  • GitHub Check: Build & Test (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Build & Test (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Code Coverage
  • GitHub Check: Build & Test (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

29-50: Navigation badges styling looks good.

The inline CSS styling for the navigation badges is correctly applied with consistent formatting across all seven badge links. The text-decoration: none; style effectively removes underlines for a cleaner visual presentation.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 38.52%. Comparing base (29bfd58) to head (66c9aa7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5566   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   38.52%   38.52%           
=======================================
  Files         816      816           
  Lines      110917   110917           
=======================================
  Hits        42728    42728           
  Misses      68189    68189           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - All CI checks passed ✅

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 052d635 into main Jan 8, 2026
20 of 21 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Doc📝] Update README.md to standardize badge links with consistent styling for improved visual coherence

4 participants