Skip to content

Conversation

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 8, 2026

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #5569

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Fixed anchor links in README to improve navigation and correct fragment identifiers.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 8, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

README.md anchor links are updated by removing leading dashes from fragment identifiers (e.g., #-overview to #overview). This standardizes internal navigation references with no functional code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
README Navigation Links
README.md
Removed leading dashes from fragment identifiers in anchor links throughout the document for improved readability and standard anchor naming conventions (7 lines changed)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • mxsm/rocketmq-rust#5563 — Updates README navigation links, complementing the anchor identifier standardization in this PR

Suggested labels

documentation📝

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🐰 Hops through anchors old and new,
Dashes fade—a cleaner view!
Fragment links now pristine bright,
README jumps feel oh-so-right!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 052d635 and 9ad081d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mxsm mxsm merged commit 2b6f360 into main Jan 8, 2026
12 of 13 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 8, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 38.52%. Comparing base (052d635) to head (9ad081d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5570   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   38.52%   38.52%           
=======================================
  Files         816      816           
  Lines      110917   110917           
=======================================
  Hits        42728    42728           
  Misses      68189    68189           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Doc📝] Update README.md to remove unnecessary style attributes from badge links for improved readability

4 participants