Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): use same version of esbuild across the board #6153

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JakeChampion
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@JakeChampion JakeChampion changed the title fix(deps): update to esbuild 0.25.1 fix(deps): use same version of esbuild across the board Mar 20, 2025
@JakeChampion JakeChampion marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2025 15:05
@JakeChampion JakeChampion requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2025 15:05
@JakeChampion JakeChampion requested a review from serhalp March 20, 2025 15:05
"version": "0.21.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/esbuild/-/esbuild-0.21.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LmHPAa5h4tSxz+g/D8IHY6wCjtIiFx8I7/Q0Aq+NmvtoYvyMnJU0KQJcqB6QH30X9x/W4CemgUtPgQDZFca5SA==",
"version": "0.25.1",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The version here went up, but the package.json claims a downgrade to 0.19.11?

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
"better-ajv-errors": "^1.2.0",
"common-path-prefix": "^3.0.0",
"env-paths": "^3.0.0",
"esbuild": "0.21.2",
"esbuild": "0.19.11",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still seeing some esbuilds with version 0.25.1 in the package-lock.json, example:

"node_modules/vite/node_modules/@esbuild/android-arm64": {
"version": "0.25.1",
...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants