Skip to content

chore(main): release dev.openfeature.contrib.providers.go-feature-flag 1.0.0 #1471

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

openfeaturebot
Copy link
Contributor

@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot commented Jul 4, 2025

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

1.0.0 (2025-07-09)

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

  • go-feature-flag: Introduce in-process evaluation + tracking (#1384)

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • deps: update dependency com.dylibso.chicory:runtime to v1.4.1 (#1408) (352ddd8)
  • deps: update dependency com.dylibso.chicory:runtime to v1.5.0 (#1462) (93115a7)
  • deps: update dependency com.dylibso.chicory:wasi to v1.4.1 (#1409) (2bc16a8)
  • deps: update dependency com.dylibso.chicory:wasi to v1.5.0 (#1473) (0030528)
  • deps: update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310 to v2.19.0 (#1366) (8896f50)
  • deps: update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310 to v2.19.1 (#1415) (c038b8e)
  • deps: update jackson monorepo to v2.19.0 (#1346) (d4af23b)
  • deps: update jackson monorepo to v2.19.1 (#1416) (43630e5)
  • gofeatureflag: fix etag in tests to be around quotes (#1432) (80084df)
  • goff: Bump version of chicory to fix flaky tests (#1423) (f6996dc)
  • goff: remove flacky test (#1427) (e455cc3)
  • require latest SDK (#1488) (71afb81)

✨ New Features


This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--dev.openfeature.contrib.providers.go-feature-flag branch from 704e41b to 9c149d7 Compare July 4, 2025 15:32
@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 4, 2025 15:32
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from thomaspoignant July 4, 2025 15:32
Copy link
Member

@toddbaert toddbaert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thomaspoignant you might want to block this if you don't want it released (I think you mentioned you wanted to do it alongside other implementations)

@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--dev.openfeature.contrib.providers.go-feature-flag branch 2 times, most recently from cd2ae07 to a5c6ab2 Compare July 7, 2025 09:49
@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--dev.openfeature.contrib.providers.go-feature-flag branch from a5c6ab2 to bfe7383 Compare July 8, 2025 11:55
@toddbaert toddbaert self-requested a review July 8, 2025 13:08
Copy link
Member

@toddbaert toddbaert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Blocking for @thomaspoignant

@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--dev.openfeature.contrib.providers.go-feature-flag branch from 93fbd51 to 3c3760a Compare July 9, 2025 15:20
@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--dev.openfeature.contrib.providers.go-feature-flag branch from 3c3760a to e9e768f Compare July 9, 2025 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants