Skip to content

Conversation

gruebel
Copy link
Member

@gruebel gruebel commented Oct 5, 2025

This PR

  • type changes are all internal

@gruebel gruebel requested review from a team as code owners October 5, 2025 11:09
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @gruebel, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on refining the type annotations and overall type safety within the flagd Python provider, particularly for its gRPC interactions. By integrating types-grpcio and introducing explicit type definitions for gRPC call arguments, the changes aim to make the codebase more robust and easier to maintain through improved static analysis. Additionally, internal method overloads have been added to provide more precise type information for flag resolution logic.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Type Safety for gRPC: The flagd provider now includes types-grpcio as a development dependency, significantly improving type checking for gRPC-related code. This addition allows for more robust static analysis and reduces potential runtime errors.
  • Refactored gRPC Channel Creation: The grpc.secure_channel calls have been refactored to explicitly pass credentials and options as named arguments, moving away from dictionary unpacking. This change enhances type inference and code readability.
  • New TypedDict for gRPC Call Arguments: A new GrpcMultiCallableArgs TypedDict has been introduced to define the expected arguments for gRPC multi-callable methods, such as EventStream and SyncFlags. This provides clearer type hints for gRPC method parameters.
  • Improved _resolve Method Type Overloads: The _resolve method in grpc.py now utilizes typing.overload decorators to provide more precise type hints for its return values, depending on the default_value type. This improves the accuracy of type checking for flag resolution.
  • Mypy Dependency Update: The mypy development dependency has been updated to version 1.18.0 in the root pyproject.toml, ensuring compatibility with the latest type checking features and improvements.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.15385% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 94.56%. Comparing base (fe8130a) to head (14c85b5).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../flagd/resolvers/process/connector/grpc_watcher.py 90.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #308      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.41%   94.56%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          21       22       +1     
  Lines        1057     1068      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits          998     1010      +12     
+ Misses         59       58       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively refines the typing within the flagd provider by introducing types-grpcio. This allows for stricter type checking of gRPC calls, which is a great improvement for code quality and maintainability. The changes, including removing the grpc.* ignore from mypy configuration and adding typing.overload to the _resolve method, are well-executed. The refactoring of grpc.secure_channel calls also enhances readability. I've included a couple of minor suggestions to make the initialization of gRPC call arguments more concise.

Signed-off-by: gruebel <[email protected]>
@gruebel gruebel merged commit b45e3c8 into main Oct 7, 2025
37 checks passed
@gruebel gruebel deleted the refine-typing branch October 7, 2025 20:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants