Nudge proof reviews toward screenshots and redaction#51
Merged
pashpashpash merged 2 commits intomainfrom May 6, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ClawSweeper already treats real behavior proof as a review gate. This keeps that guidance lightweight while making two small tone changes: prefer screenshots when they can show behavior, and remind contributors to redact private details before posting evidence.
The deterministic fallback comment uses the same wording, so missing-proof reviews point contributors at screenshots without pushing them away from logs or live output when those are the right proof.