-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8358801: javac produces class that does not pass verifier. #25849
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
lahodaj
wants to merge
1
commit into
openjdk:master
Choose a base branch
from
lahodaj:JDK-8358801
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+144
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Copyright (c) 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | ||
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. | ||
* | ||
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it | ||
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as | ||
* published by the Free Software Foundation. | ||
* | ||
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT | ||
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or | ||
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License | ||
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that | ||
* accompanied this code). | ||
* | ||
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version | ||
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, | ||
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. | ||
* | ||
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA | ||
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any | ||
* questions. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* @test | ||
* @bug 8358801 | ||
* @summary Verify variables introduced by let expressions are correctly undefined | ||
* @library /tools/lib | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
import java.nio.file.Files; | ||
import java.nio.file.Path; | ||
import java.nio.file.Paths; | ||
import java.util.Arrays; | ||
|
||
import javax.tools.JavaFileObject; | ||
import javax.tools.ToolProvider; | ||
|
||
import com.sun.source.util.JavacTask; | ||
import java.lang.classfile.ClassFile; | ||
import java.util.ArrayList; | ||
import java.util.List; | ||
import java.util.Objects; | ||
import javax.tools.JavaCompiler; | ||
|
||
import toolbox.JavaTask; | ||
import toolbox.Task; | ||
import toolbox.TestRunner; | ||
import toolbox.ToolBox; | ||
|
||
public class T8358801 extends TestRunner { | ||
private ToolBox tb; | ||
|
||
public static void main(String... args) throws Exception { | ||
new T8358801().runTests(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
T8358801() { | ||
super(System.err); | ||
tb = new ToolBox(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public void runTests() throws Exception { | ||
runTests(m -> new Object[] { Paths.get(m.getName()) }); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void testPatternsInJava(Path base) throws Exception { | ||
Path classes = base.resolve("classes"); | ||
|
||
List<JavaFileObject> files = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
files.add(new ToolBox.JavaSource( | ||
""" | ||
public class Main { | ||
private boolean test(String s, int i) { | ||
if (s.subSequence(0, 1) instanceof Runnable r) { | ||
return true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
switch (i) { | ||
case 0: | ||
String clashing1 = null; | ||
String clashing2 = null; | ||
String clashing3 = null; | ||
String clashing4 = null; | ||
return true; | ||
default: | ||
System.out.println("correct"); | ||
return true; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
public static void main(String[] args) { | ||
new Main().test("hello", 1); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
""" | ||
)); | ||
|
||
if (Files.exists(classes)) { | ||
tb.cleanDirectory(classes); | ||
} else { | ||
Files.createDirectories(classes); | ||
} | ||
|
||
JavaCompiler compiler = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler(); | ||
Iterable<String> options = Arrays.asList("-d", classes.toString()); | ||
JavacTask task = (JavacTask) compiler.getTask(null, null, null, options, null, files); | ||
|
||
task.generate(); | ||
|
||
List<VerifyError> errors = ClassFile.of().verify(classes.resolve("Main.class")); | ||
|
||
if (!errors.isEmpty()) { | ||
throw new AssertionError("verify errors found: " + errors); | ||
} | ||
|
||
List<String> log = | ||
new JavaTask(tb).classpath(classes.toString()) | ||
.className("Main") | ||
.run() | ||
.writeAll() | ||
.getOutputLines(Task.OutputKind.STDOUT); | ||
List<String> expected = List.of("correct"); | ||
|
||
if (!Objects.equals(log, expected)) { | ||
throw new AssertionError("Incorrect result, expected: " + expected + | ||
", got: " + log); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we move this truncation of variables to CondItem itself? I moved the truncation of continue/break to GenContext and found that helpful, maybe we can require an extra int arg for
makeCondItem(int, Chain, Chain)
for the limit?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me, personally: while doing it here is not perfect (mostly because I would prefer if we didn't have to do this bookkeeping at all), it seems to me like a fairly local property - the let expr starts, and then does its own cleanup. It already calls
code.endScopes(limit);
above this change, so this is basically an extension to that. If we did it atmakeCondItem
time, we would need to pass the limit everywheremakeCondItem
is called, making it non-local. Many parts of the code would now suddenly have to care whether the node is inside a let expression. That feels to me like increasing complexity.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds reasonable. I asked this because I could see
undefineVariablesInChain
being used elsewhere, such asGenContext::addCont/addExit
. We should probably update those two sites, as I didn't consider a linked list chain being used in those sites.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or you can even make it an instance method on Chain - the limit can be considered an intrinsic property to where the chain leads to, except this information is not available when a chain is constructed (should it be?)