Skip to content

8358801: javac produces class that does not pass verifier. #25849

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/jvm/Gen.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -756,13 +756,25 @@ public CondItem genCond(JCTree _tree, boolean markBranches) {
}
CondItem result = genCond(tree.expr, markBranches);
code.endScopes(limit);
//make sure variables defined in the let expression are not included
//in the defined variables for jumps that go outside of this let
//expression:
undefineVariablesInChain(result.falseJumps, limit);
undefineVariablesInChain(result.trueJumps, limit);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we move this truncation of variables to CondItem itself? I moved the truncation of continue/break to GenContext and found that helpful, maybe we can require an extra int arg for makeCondItem(int, Chain, Chain) for the limit?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To me, personally: while doing it here is not perfect (mostly because I would prefer if we didn't have to do this bookkeeping at all), it seems to me like a fairly local property - the let expr starts, and then does its own cleanup. It already calls code.endScopes(limit); above this change, so this is basically an extension to that. If we did it at makeCondItem time, we would need to pass the limit everywhere makeCondItem is called, making it non-local. Many parts of the code would now suddenly have to care whether the node is inside a let expression. That feels to me like increasing complexity.

Copy link
Member

@liach liach Jun 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds reasonable. I asked this because I could see undefineVariablesInChain being used elsewhere, such as GenContext::addCont/addExit. We should probably update those two sites, as I didn't consider a linked list chain being used in those sites.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or you can even make it an instance method on Chain - the limit can be considered an intrinsic property to where the chain leads to, except this information is not available when a chain is constructed (should it be?)

return result;
} else {
CondItem result = genExpr(_tree, syms.booleanType).mkCond();
if (markBranches) result.tree = _tree;
return result;
}
}
//where:
private void undefineVariablesInChain(Chain toClear, int limit) {
while (toClear != null) {
toClear.state.defined.excludeFrom(limit);
toClear = toClear.next;
}
}

public Code getCode() {
return code;
Expand Down
132 changes: 132 additions & 0 deletions test/langtools/tools/javac/patterns/T8358801.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/

/**
* @test
* @bug 8358801
* @summary Verify variables introduced by let expressions are correctly undefined
* @library /tools/lib
*/

import java.nio.file.Files;
import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.nio.file.Paths;
import java.util.Arrays;

import javax.tools.JavaFileObject;
import javax.tools.ToolProvider;

import com.sun.source.util.JavacTask;
import java.lang.classfile.ClassFile;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Objects;
import javax.tools.JavaCompiler;

import toolbox.JavaTask;
import toolbox.Task;
import toolbox.TestRunner;
import toolbox.ToolBox;

public class T8358801 extends TestRunner {
private ToolBox tb;

public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
new T8358801().runTests();
}

T8358801() {
super(System.err);
tb = new ToolBox();
}

public void runTests() throws Exception {
runTests(m -> new Object[] { Paths.get(m.getName()) });
}

@Test
public void testPatternsInJava(Path base) throws Exception {
Path classes = base.resolve("classes");

List<JavaFileObject> files = new ArrayList<>();
files.add(new ToolBox.JavaSource(
"""
public class Main {
private boolean test(String s, int i) {
if (s.subSequence(0, 1) instanceof Runnable r) {
return true;
}

switch (i) {
case 0:
String clashing1 = null;
String clashing2 = null;
String clashing3 = null;
String clashing4 = null;
return true;
default:
System.out.println("correct");
return true;
}
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
new Main().test("hello", 1);
}
}
"""
));

if (Files.exists(classes)) {
tb.cleanDirectory(classes);
} else {
Files.createDirectories(classes);
}

JavaCompiler compiler = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler();
Iterable<String> options = Arrays.asList("-d", classes.toString());
JavacTask task = (JavacTask) compiler.getTask(null, null, null, options, null, files);

task.generate();

List<VerifyError> errors = ClassFile.of().verify(classes.resolve("Main.class"));

if (!errors.isEmpty()) {
throw new AssertionError("verify errors found: " + errors);
}

List<String> log =
new JavaTask(tb).classpath(classes.toString())
.className("Main")
.run()
.writeAll()
.getOutputLines(Task.OutputKind.STDOUT);
List<String> expected = List.of("correct");

if (!Objects.equals(log, expected)) {
throw new AssertionError("Incorrect result, expected: " + expected +
", got: " + log);
}
}

}