Skip to content

8360641: TestCompilerCounts fails after 8354727 #26024

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mhaessig
Copy link
Contributor

@mhaessig mhaessig commented Jun 27, 2025

After integrating #25872 the calculation of theCICompilerCount ergonomic became dependent on the size of NonNMethodCodeHeapSize, which itself is an ergonomic based on the available memory. Thus, depending on the system, the test compiler/arguments/TestCompilerCounts.java failed, i.e. locally this failed, but not on CI servers.

This PR changes the test to reflect the changes introduced in #25872.

Testing:


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8360641: TestCompilerCounts fails after 8354727 (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26024/head:pull/26024
$ git checkout pull/26024

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26024
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26024/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26024

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26024

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26024.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 27, 2025

👋 Welcome back mhaessig! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@mhaessig This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8360641: TestCompilerCounts fails after 8354727

Reviewed-by: mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 29 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@mhaessig The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@dafedafe dafedafe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for fixing this @mhaessig!
I left a couple of inline comments and just noticed you might want to add the copyright note as well 🙂

}

// Buffer sizes for caclulating the maximum number of compiler threads.
static final int NonNMethodCodeHeapSize = 5 * 1024 * 1024;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the NonNMethodCodeHeapSize value chosen "on purpose"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really. We could choose it to be larger. That would just make the cutoff be at a higher CPU count. With 5 MiB, this will also perform a cutoff with less CPUs and should test both code paths on more machines.

Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for fixing it! I have tested it successfully. Looks good besides what other reviewers have already commented.

@mhaessig
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vnkozlov, @dafedafe, and @TheRealMDoerr, thank you for having a look! I addressed all your comments in ab1c7d9.

Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler [email protected] ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants