-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8364936: Shenandoah: Switch nmethod entry barriers to conc_instruction_and_data_patch #26999
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back cslucas! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@JohnTortugo This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 229 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@JohnTortugo The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
I see |
Thanks for this patch! I've made similar changes on RISC-V. PS: max-jOPS in SPEC improved by ~5% and critical-jOPS in SPEC improved by ~3% on SG2042. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for doing this. Looks good to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
(cherry picked from commit 495b07f)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just checked the RISC-V part. LGTM. Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
@TheRealMDoerr - @shipilev mentioned in private that you have access to PPC machines; could you please help testing this patch on PPC? |
@TheRealMDoerr - gentle nudge. |
@dbriemann - do you have access to a PPC machine that you can use to test this patch? TIA. |
This change is a NOP for PPC64 since we're generating the same code for both patching types. GHA cross build has passed, so there's nothing to worry regarding PPC64. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 81a1e8e.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@JohnTortugo Pushed as commit 81a1e8e. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Please, review this patch to make nmethod entry barriers use
conc-instruction-and-data-patch
fence mechanics when ShenandoahGC is being used on AArch64. The patch also removes (including from JVMCI interface) the old constant that was being used only by Shenandoah on AArch64.The patch has been tested with functional and performance benchmarks on AArch64. Improvements in DaCapo and Renaissance benchmarks can be as high as 30%. Maximum critical Jops in SPEC improved by ~10%.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26999/head:pull/26999
$ git checkout pull/26999
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26999
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26999/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26999
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26999
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26999.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment