Skip to content

Conversation

@benty-amzn
Copy link

@benty-amzn benty-amzn commented Dec 10, 2025

This change merges PtrQueue into its only child class, SATBMarkQueue. The corresponding PtrQueueSet is merged with SATBMarkQueueSet, and G1SATBMarkQueueSet and ShenandoahSATBMarkQueueSet continue to inherit from that class.

There are few code modifications - most methods were moved directly from PtrQueue to SATBMarkQueue. The one meaningful change is to preserve SATBMarkQueue's call to filter(queue); before flush_queue.

This change passes all tier1 jtreg tests with both Shenandoah and G1 in local testing.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8372250: Merge PtrQueue into SATBMarkQueue (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28755/head:pull/28755
$ git checkout pull/28755

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28755
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28755/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28755

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28755

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28755.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 10, 2025

👋 Welcome back btaylor! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@benty-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8372250: Merge PtrQueue into SATBMarkQueue

Reviewed-by: kbarrett, iwalulya, tschatzl, wkemper

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 89 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@kimbarrett, @walulyai, @tschatzl, @earthling-amzn) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@benty-amzn The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 10, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link

@kimbarrett kimbarrett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks mostly good, with just a few minor nits.

I think there may be further simplifications and cleanups possible, but
looking for those can be done later, once this relatively clean merging change
is done.

[appropriate place is not commentable in github diff]
SATBMarkQueueSet::enqueue_completed_buffer should no longer be virtual. (This
would have been caught if it had been changed to "override" once that was
permitted, but nobody got around to that.)

{}

SATBMarkQueue::~SATBMarkQueue() {
assert(_buf == nullptr, "queue must be flushed before delete");

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Too much indentation.


void SATBMarkQueueSet::deallocate_buffer(BufferNode* node) {
_allocator->release(node);
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing newline?

void deallocate_buffer(BufferNode* node);

// A completed buffer is a buffer the mutator is finished with, and
// is ready to be processed by the collector. It need not be full.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment (copied from ptrQueueSet) seems misplaced here. Perhaps it should be part of the
class description?


// Installs a new buffer into queue.
void install_new_buffer(SATBMarkQueue& queue);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These helper functions hoisted from PtrQueueSet should be private rather than protected here.

@kimbarrett
Copy link

commit 148aa4f didn't address this comment:

[appropriate place is not commentable in github diff]
SATBMarkQueueSet::enqueue_completed_buffer should no longer be virtual. (This
would have been caught if it had been changed to "override" once that was
permitted, but nobody got around to that.)

Copy link

@kimbarrett kimbarrett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 12, 2025
private:
NONCOPYABLE(SATBMarkQueue);

// The buffer.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could refactor rename to _buffer so we don't need the comment above. But that does not have to be done as part of this change.

@benty-amzn
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Dec 12, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2025

@benty-amzn
Your change (at version 517b245) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Going to push as commit 0eb2bcd.
Since your change was applied there have been 89 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Dec 12, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2025

@earthling-amzn @benty-amzn Pushed as commit 0eb2bcd.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-gc [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants