Skip to content

Conversation

@l-qing
Copy link

@l-qing l-qing commented Oct 31, 2025

Previously, when a user was listed as both an individual User approver and
a member of a Group approver, the function would return early after checking
the first matching approver type. This prevented the user from using their
other approval identity entirely.

For example, if User entry appeared before Group entry in the approvers list,
the user could only approve as an individual user and their Group membership
was completely ignored.

This fix changes IsUserApprovalChanged to check all approver types without
early returns, accumulating valid changes. Now users can exercise all their
approval permissions regardless of the order in approvers list.

… group member

Previously, when a user was listed as both an individual User approver and
a member of a Group approver, the function would return early after checking
the first matching approver type. This prevented the user from using their
other approval identity entirely.

For example, if User entry appeared before Group entry in the approvers list,
the user could only approve as an individual user and their Group membership
was completely ignored.

This fix changes IsUserApprovalChanged to check all approver types without
early returns, accumulating valid changes. Now users can exercise all their
approval permissions regardless of the order in approvers list.
- Replace manual loop-based slice contains logic with slices.Contains
- Apply to group membership checks in ifUserExists, IsUserApprovalChanged,
  CheckOtherUsersForInvalidChanges, and checkIfUserAlreadyDecided
- Replace webhookContains helper function with direct slices.Contains usage
- Clean up trailing whitespace
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 31, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: l-qing
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign piyush-garg for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Hi @l-qing. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant