Skip to content

Conversation

theakshaypant
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ“ Description of the Change

When --force-install-gosmee flag is set, skip OpenShift route detection and unconditionally install the gosmee forwarder, regardless of the platform.

πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€ Linked Jira

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVKP-9062

πŸ”— Linked GitHub Issue

Fixes #2067

πŸš€ Type of Change

  • πŸ› Bug fix (fix:)
  • ✨ New feature (feat:)
  • πŸ’₯ Breaking change (feat!:, fix!:)
  • πŸ“š Documentation update (docs:)
  • βš™οΈ Chore (chore:)
  • πŸ’… Refactor (refactor:)
  • πŸ”§ Enhancement (enhance:)
  • πŸ“¦ Dependency update (deps:)

πŸ§ͺ Testing Strategy

  • Unit tests
  • Integration tests
  • End-to-end tests
  • Manual testing
  • Not Applicable
Screenshot From 2025-10-13 16-04-15

πŸ€– AI Assistance

  • I have not used any AI assistance for this PR.
  • I have used AI assistance for this PR.

If you have used AI assistance, please provide the following details:

Which LLM was used?

  • GitHub Copilot
  • ChatGPT (OpenAI)
  • Claude (Anthropic)
  • Cursor
  • Gemini (Google)
  • Other: ____________

Extent of AI Assistance:

  • Documentation and research only
  • Unit tests or E2E tests only
  • Code generation (parts of the code)
  • Full code generation (most of the PR)
  • PR description and comments
  • Commit message(s)

Important

If the majority of the code in this PR was generated by an AI, please add a Co-authored-by trailer to your commit message.
For example:

Co-authored-by: Gemini [email protected]
Co-authored-by: ChatGPT [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Claude [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Cursor [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Copilot [email protected]

**πŸ’‘You can use the script ./hack/add-llm-coauthor.sh to automatically add
these co-author trailers to your commits.

βœ… Submitter Checklist

  • πŸ“ My commit messages are clear, informative, and follow the project's How to write a git commit message guide. The Gitlint linter ensures in CI it's properly validated
  • ✨ I have ensured my commit message prefix (e.g., fix:, feat:) matches the "Type of Change" I selected above.
  • β™½ I have run make test and make lint locally to check for and fix any
    issues. For an efficient workflow, I have considered installing
    pre-commit and running pre-commit install to
    automate these checks.
  • πŸ“– I have added or updated documentation for any user-facing changes.
  • πŸ§ͺ I have added sufficient unit tests for my code changes.
  • 🎁 I have added end-to-end tests where feasible. See README for more details.
  • πŸ”Ž I have addressed any CI test flakiness or provided a clear reason to bypass it.
  • If adding a provider feature, I have filled in the following and updated the provider documentation:
    • GitHub App
    • GitHub Webhook
    • Gitea/Forgejo
    • GitLab
    • Bitbucket Cloud
    • Bitbucket Data Center

Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @theakshaypant, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a bug in the CLI's bootstrap command where the --force-install-gosmee flag did not fully respect its intended behavior. The changes ensure that when this flag is provided, the gosmee forwarder is installed without any conditional checks related to OpenShift route detection, providing a more predictable and direct installation experience for users.

Highlights

  • Gosmee Installation Logic: The --force-install-gosmee flag now correctly bypasses OpenShift route detection and unconditionally installs the gosmee forwarder, ensuring predictable behavior.
  • OpenShift Route Detection: Route detection is now explicitly skipped when forceInstallGosmee is active, preventing unnecessary checks and streamlining the bootstrap process.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with πŸ‘ and πŸ‘Ž on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

Copy link

πŸ” PR Lint Feedback

Note: This automated check helps ensure your PR follows our contribution guidelines.

⚠️ Items that need attention:

πŸ€– AI attribution

The following commits lack an explicit AI attribution footer:

  • e02c1a6 fix(cli): respect forceInstallGosmee in bootstrap

If no AI assistance was used for a commit, you can ignore this warning.
Otherwise add an Assisted-by: or Co-authored-by: footer referencing the AI used.


ℹ️ Next Steps

  • Review and address the items above
  • Push new commits to update this PR
  • This comment will be automatically updated when issues are resolved
πŸ”§ Admin Tools (click to expand)

Automated Issue/Ticket Creation:

  • /issue-create - Generate a GitHub issue from this PR content using AI
  • /jira-create - Create a SRVKP Jira ticket from this PR content using AI

⚠️ Important: Always review and edit generated content before finalizing tickets/issues.
The AI-generated content should be used as a starting point and may need adjustments.

These commands are available to maintainers and will post the generated content as PR comments for review.

πŸ€– This feedback was generated automatically by the PR CI system

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to correctly handle the --force-install-gosmee flag during the bootstrap process. The change to skip OpenShift route detection when this flag is used is a good fix. However, another change appears to remove the helpful interactive prompt that offered to install the gosmee forwarder for users on non-OpenShift platforms. This could be a regression in usability, and I've provided a comment with a suggestion to address it.

@theakshaypant theakshaypant requested a review from zakisk October 15, 2025 17:27
@chmouel
Copy link
Member

chmouel commented Oct 16, 2025

thanks, can you check cli.md documentationa nd see to update or rephrase the bootstrap function to mention that force-gosmee will always use gosmee even on openshift bypassing openshift route detection

When --force-install-gosmee flag is set, skip OpenShift route
detection and unconditionally install the gosmee forwarder,
regardless of the platform.
Updated the docs to make this change more clear and explicit.

Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVKP-9062

Signed-off-by: Akshay Pant <[email protected]>
@theakshaypant theakshaypant force-pushed the SRVKP-9062-fix-force-gosmee-flag-with-openshift branch from e02c1a6 to c998dea Compare October 17, 2025 04:31
@theakshaypant
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks, can you check cli.md documentationa nd see to update or rephrase the bootstrap function to mention that force-gosmee will always use gosmee even on openshift bypassing openshift route detection

Updated the docs to make this change more apparent and explicit in the docs.

(which can be useful if you are running [OpenShift Local](https://developers.redhat.com/products/openshift-local/overview) for instance).
<https://hook.pipelinesascode.com> and set it up on GitHub.

**Important:** On OpenShift, the bootstrap command automatically detects and uses
Copy link
Member

@chmouel chmouel Oct 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Usually, I want to make sure we only use "Important" and things like that sporadically where there is a tricky part of the flow.

We usually add those Important tag when updating documentation because it seems important to say at the time of a pull request and in that context, but with multiple pull requests piling up, we end up with a lot of "Important" notes everywhere. I'd rather have a proper paragraph that reads from top to bottom like a user would do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

--force-gosmee Option Not Working in tkn-pac bootstrap

3 participants