-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
OCPBUGS-61470: [release-4.13] Add NetworkPolicy as a supported kind #1053
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-61470: [release-4.13] Add NetworkPolicy as a supported kind #1053
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-registry Upstream-commit: 919aefdce3f4d6b77c3872df249815d20749db94
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: d7aaeb11ab80f862fc9c70dfb7865158bb67e28c
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: anik120 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
e219413
to
bc29458
Compare
/retest |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/retest |
Test PASS /label qe-approved
|
/test all |
/override verify |
/verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh |
@jianzhangbjz: This PR has been marked as verified by In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@perdasilva: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:
If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/override ci/prow/verify We're ok with these staging changes |
@perdasilva: Overrode contexts on behalf of perdasilva: ci/prow/verify In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
/retest |
@anik120: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retitle OCPBUGS-61470: [release-4.13] Add NetworkPolicy as a supported kind |
@anik120: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/lgtm |
/jira refresh |
@tmshort: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
5f66f1a
into
openshift:release-4.13
@anik120: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-lifecycle-manager |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-registry |
Manual cherry-pick of #1047