Skip to content

Conversation

@OscarBakker
Copy link
Contributor

@OscarBakker OscarBakker commented Jan 9, 2026

De originele pr, ik weet even niet of dit voor amsterdam specifiek is gemaakt.

@OscarBakker OscarBakker requested review from a team as code owners January 9, 2026 18:47
@OscarBakker OscarBakker requested review from IanR01 and iandebruin98 and removed request for a team January 9, 2026 18:47
@OscarBakker OscarBakker changed the title Refactor StemBegrootResourceDetailDialog and StemBegrootResourceList … Link to original plan moved to dialog sidebar Jan 9, 2026
@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Jan 9, 2026

Openstad Headless    Run #1256

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #1256  •  git commit fd91170630: Add options with backward compatibility
Project Openstad Headless
Branch Review begroot-ui-tweaks-upstream
Run status status check passed Passed #1256
Run duration 21m 51s
Commit git commit fd91170630: Add options with backward compatibility
Committer oscarbakker
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 51
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Jan 9, 2026

Openstad Headless    Run #1257

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #1257  •  git commit c339fc1d8e ℹ️: Merge fd9117063032d5a96c3559a5d96d38496dfc015f into 06c48c127354ad7ffe7ef5b1ce9e...
Project Openstad Headless
Branch Review begroot-ui-tweaks-upstream
Run status status check passed Passed #1257
Run duration 21m 35s
Commit git commit c339fc1d8e ℹ️: Merge fd9117063032d5a96c3559a5d96d38496dfc015f into 06c48c127354ad7ffe7ef5b1ce9e...
Committer Oscar
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 51
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Comment on lines -280 to -295
{originalUrl ? (
<>
<Paragraph className="strong">
Dit een vervolg op het volgende plan:&nbsp;
<Link target="_blank" href={originalUrl}>
{originalUrl}
</Link>
</Paragraph>

</>
) : null}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you make this into an option with backwards compatibility?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added options, let me know it we're on the same line

Comment on lines -201 to -216
{
originalUrl ? (
<>
<Paragraph className="strong">
Dit een vervolg op plan:&nbsp;
<Link target="_blank" href={originalUrl}>
{originalUrl}
</Link>
</Paragraph>
</>
) : null}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you make this into an option with backwards compatibility?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

idem

)}
<Heading level={2} appearance="utrecht-heading-4" dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: resource.title}}/>
<Paragraph dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: elipsizeHTML(resource.summary, 100)}}/>
<Paragraph dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: elipsizeHTML(resource.description, 200)}}/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be an option with backwards compatibility in mind.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

idem

@ferhany ferhany linked an issue Jan 28, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve begrootmodule

4 participants