Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GH1173 Experiment with fuller typing #1193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
GH1173 Experiment with fuller typing #1193
Changes from all commits
a970e3f
36bc58e
271cf8d
34ea623
d19ac89
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not clear why you need this overload when the previous overload covers it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test would raise a mypy/pyright error without the other overload.
pandas-stubs/tests/test_frame.py
Lines 532 to 536 in d19ac89
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My take on this is that we shouldn't support the
kwargs
being passed in adict
, because they can't be type-checked. The docs say whatkwargs
are acceptable, via theeval()
link, so let's not include this test (and the overloads supportingkwargs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same comment - not sure why we need this overload when the previous one covers it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The goal was to still allow for someone passing kwargs as a dictionary instead of the individual arguments since it is the way documented in the docs like
df.query("col1 > col2", **kwargs)
that you would pass from another function.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea is that someone may put a wrapper like:
If you drop the second overload this will raise an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the goal here is to restrict the possible keyword arguments, so we should remove the overload.